SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

LIMITS OF RATIONALITY IN POSTWAR EXPERIENCE: A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF DECISION-MAKING UNDER EPISTEMIC AND MORAL UNCERTAINTY

Valeriya Kalchenko

First published: 2025https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscah.2025/s01.10View metrics

Abstract

This article reconstructs the concept of rationality within the context of postwar experience, where the subject faces epistemic injustice, moral instability, and hermeneutic exclusion. It critically examines the limitations of instrumental and procedural models of rationality under conditions of disrupted norms and fragmented meaning, and proposes an alternative framework — axiological rationality — grounded in the subject’s internal moral discernment rather than external normative systems. The study draws on insights from humanistic philosophy, hermeneutics, critical theory, and social epistemology to interpret rationality as a multidimensional ethical and ontological process of existential positioning. Axiological rationality is understood as a value-oriented mode of meaning-making and moral orientation, emerging not from institutional authority but from the subject’s internal resources and existential positioning, it emphasizes inner responsibility, symbolic recovery, and the affirmation of meaning in contexts of disorientation and normative collapse. Special attention is given to hermeneutic injustice — the inability to articulate traumatic experiences and the structural exclusion of certain voices from public discourse. Rather than rejecting reason, the research expands its conceptual boundaries, reconfiguring rationality as a communicative effort to restore meaning, seek recognition, and sustain agency amid fragmentation and moral destabilization. Postwar rationality thus emerges not as a rejection of logic or scientific thought but as a humanistic expansion of reason that enables the subject to act meaningfully even under conditions of trauma and uncertainty.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
LIMITS OF RATIONALITY IN POSTWAR EXPERIENCE: A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF DECISION-MAKING UNDER EPISTEMIC AND MORAL UNCERTAINTY
Authors
Valeriya Kalchenko
Proceedings
Proceedings of 12th SWS International Scientific Conference on Arts And Humanities - ISCAH 2025
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2025
Pages
101-108
SWS Citekey
Kalchenko20252101108
ISSN
2682-9940
ISBN
978-3-903438-15-6
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References17
  1. Cavarero, A. (2009). Horrorism: Naming contemporary violence. Columbia University.

  2. Adorno, Theodor W., and Max Horkheimer. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  3. Adorno, T. W. (1974). Minima moralia: Reflections on a damaged life (E. F. N. Jephcott, Ed.). Verso

  4. RicЕ“ur, Paul. 2004. Memory, History, Forgetting. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  5. RicЕ“ur, Paul. 1992. Oneself as Another. Translated by Kathleen Blamey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  6. Honneth, Axel. 2007. Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  7. Young, Iris Marion. 1997. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference, edited by Seyla Benhabib, 120–135. Princeton University Press.

  8. Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  9. Herman, J. L. 1992. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books.

  10. Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  11. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  12. Fromm, Erich. 1990. Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

  13. Fromm, Erich. 1955. The Sane Society. New York: Rinehart

  14. Habermas, JГјrgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.

  15. Craps, Stef. 2012. Postcolonial Witnessing: Trauma Out of Bounds. London: Palgrave Macmillan

  16. Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Polity Press.

  17. Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list