SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

GOLDEN SHARES IN THE CJEU CASE-LAW. THE CONTRIBUTION OF VOLKSWAGEN I DECISION

Gina ORGA-DUMITRIU

First published: 2023https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2023/s02.05View metrics

Abstract

Closely linked to the economic developments that followed after the Second World War, the emergence of golden shares was conceived as a way of preserving in favor of the public power the control over the companies initially owned by the state and subsequently privatized. They are shares that grant the state, as a shareholder, special prerogatives in companies that operate in strategic economic sectors (public security, defense, energy, telecommunications). Recognizing the state (minority in capital!) privileged faculties of a nature to ensure its control of the decision-making process, golden shares have been qualified by the Court of Justice of the European Union as barriers to the free movement of capital as they discourage acquisitions of participations and, implicitly, foreign investments. Traditionally, the Court in Luxembourg has shown very strict control over golden shares and very rarely has received the imperative reasons of general interest often invoked by states to justify them. A landmark judgment for the golden shares case law is the one pronounced in the case Commission v. Germany by which the Court, sitting as the Grand Chamber, admitted the action for failure to fulfill obligations introduced by the European Commission following the regime established by the provisions of the Volkswagen Law, more precisely the specific powers recognized to the Federal State and the Land of Lower Saxony in Volkswagen company. The Court not only had the opportunity to contribute to strengthening the free movement of capital but also to provide a model of analysis of the restrictions that stem from what we call golden shares. The study aims not only a detailed description of the case-law but also elements of novelty of the judgment that widens the debate on justifying restrictions from the perspective of specific reasons such as protecting the interests of employees and minority shareholders.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
GOLDEN SHARES IN THE CJEU CASE-LAW. THE CONTRIBUTION OF VOLKSWAGEN I DECISION
Authors
Gina ORGA-DUMITRIU
Proceedings
Proceedings of 10th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2023
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2023
Pages
77-84
SWS Citekey
ORGA-DUMITRIU20232111_1
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-06-4
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References14
  1. See Antonaki, Ilektra, Keck in Capital? Redefining 'Restrictions' in the 'Golden Shares' Case Law, in Erasmus Law Review, vol. 9, no. 4, 2016, pp. 181; S. Grundmann and F. Moslein, The Golden Share – State Control in Privatised Companies: Comparative Law, European Law and Policy Aspects, in European Banking & Financial Law Journal (EUREDIA), vol. I, 2004, pp. 623, 633.

  2. For developments on golden shares litigation and the contribution of CJEU case-law, see Papadopoulos Thomas, Privatizations of State-owned companies and justifications for restrictions on EU fundamental freedoms: past, present and future perspectives, in Julien Chaisse, Jedrzej Gorski and Dini Sejko (eds.) Regulation of State-Controlled Enterprises: An Interdisciplinary and Comparative Examination, Springer, 2022, pp 223-270.

  3. See Golden shares, in CAPITAL Magazine, 13 March 2003, available at https://www.capital.ro/actiunea-de-aur-8780.html

  4. Gallo Danielle, On the Content and Scope of National and European Solidarity under Free Movement Rules: The Case of Golden Shares and Sovereign Investments, in European Papers, vol. 1, 2016, no. 3, pp. 823-845.

  5. CJEC, judgment of 4 June 2002, Case C-503/99, Commission v. Belgium EU:C:2002:328, paras. 55-57.

  6. See Opinion of Advocate General Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer in Case C-112/05, Commission v. Germany, ECLI:EU:C:2007:92, para 1.

  7. See Parvulesco, Constantin, Coccinelle. Triomphe de la voiture populaire, ETAI, Boulogne Billancourt, 2006, pp. 27.

  8. Law on the privatisation of shares of Volkswagenwerk GmbH of 21 July 1960, as amended on 6 September 1965 and 31 July 1970 (in official name Gesetz uber die Uberfuhrung der Anteilsrechte an der Volkswagenwerk Gesellschaft mit beschrankter Haftung in private Hand)

  9. CJCE (Grand Chamber) of 23 October 2007, Case C-112/05, Commission v. Germany, EU:C:2007:623, para. 34 (Volkswagen I).

  10. Volkswagen I, paras. 22 and 23.

  11. Opinion of AG Colomer in Volkswagen I, paras. 71 and 72.

  12. Volkswagen I, paragraph 65.

  13. Idem, para. 70.

  14. Ibidem, paras. 74 and 76.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list