SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

BUILDING BLOCKS OF DECISION-MAKING: PERCEIVED QUALITY OF ORGANISATIONAL DECISION-MAKING BY KNOWLEDGE WORKERS IN FINNISH ORGANISATIONS

M. Kooskora, E. Reittila

First published: 2017https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/32/S11.006View metrics

Abstract

In a knowledge-intensive economy, the ability of the individual knowledge worker to produce high quality decisions is perhaps one of the most valuable assets organisations today has and organisations are increasingly concerned with ways of making better decisions, because an organisation’s ability to make high quality decisions is of utmost importance for its success. Consequently, a knowledge worker’s primary deliverable is a good decision, which emphasises their essential role in producing high quality decisions at all levels of organisations. Given the importance of decision quality especially for organisations employing knowledge workers, the purpose of our study is to find out what contributes to the high level of decision quality perceived by knowledge workers. In order to address the research objective and fill in a gap in current research, two research questions were set: 1) Which decision quality building blocks are considered of high quality by knowledge workers? 2) Does the perception on decision quality by knowledge workers at high managerial level differ from perceptions of those working as experts or middle-level managers? The research subject was structured and the collected research data was analysed against three main elements that define organisational decision quality, the ethics and values, decision-making process and outcome, and organisational culture, labeled as building blocks of decision quality. The research data was collected in cooperation with a decision technology company Fingertip via an online questionnaire amongst knowledge workers representing different types of organisations operating in Finland. Altogether 98 valid responses were received and analysed with the help descriptive statistics, cross- tabulations and nonparametric (significance) testing. The results showed that knowledge workers perceive the quality of decisions in their organisations generally being quite high on all three observed building blocks of decision quality. There are however differences between perceptions of knowledge workers belonging to higher management in their organisations and those belonging to middle management or working at expert level: it seems according to the results that the perception of organisational decision quality is dependent (biased) on the respondent’s level in his/her organisation.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
BUILDING BLOCKS OF DECISION-MAKING: PERCEIVED QUALITY OF ORGANISATIONAL DECISION-MAKING BY KNOWLEDGE WORKERS IN FINNISH ORGANISATIONS
Authors
M. Kooskora, E. Reittila
Proceedings
4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2017
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2017
Pages
43-50
SWS Citekey
Kooskora2017114350
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7408-19-5
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References13
  1. Drucker, P. F. The effective executive. New York, NY: HarperBusiness, 2006.

  2. Martin, R. L. Rethinking the Decision Factory. Harvard Business Review (online). October issue. https://hbr.org/2013/10/rethinking-the-decision-factory, 2013.

  3. Bearth, M. Employee Contributions to Organizational Decision-Making Processes and Outcomes. St. Catherine University. http://sophia.stkate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=maol_theses (2.5.2017), 2015.

  4. Pearce, C. & Manz, C. The New Silver Bullets of Leadership: The Importance of Self- and Shared Leadership in Knowledge Work. Organizational Dynamics vol. 34 /issue 2, pp. 130–140, 2005.

  5. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, vol. 47 / issue 2, pp. 263–292, 1979.

  6. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, vol. 39 / issue 4, pp. 341–350, 1984.

  7. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, vol. 5 / issue 2, pp. 207–232, 1973.

  8. Milkman, K.L., Chugh, D. & Bazerman, M. How can decision making be improved? Working paper 08-102. (online) http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/08-102.pdf (3.5.2017), 2008.

  9. Parker, A. M., Bruin, W., & Fischhoff, B. Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes. Judgment and Decision Making, vol 2 / issue 6, pp. 342–350, 2007.

  10. Kooskora, M. Perceptions of business purpose and responsibility in the context of radical political and economic development: the case of Estonia. Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 15 / issue 2, pp. 183–199, 2006.

  11. McNamee, J. & Celona, P. Decision analysis for the practitioner. 4th ed. SmartOrg, Menlo Park, 2001.

  12. Larson, E. A Checklist for Making Faster, Better Decisions. Harvard Business Review, (online). March 7th. https://hbr.org/2016/03/a-checklist-for-making-faster-better-decisions (23.5.2017), 2016.

  13. Scott-Ladd, B. & Chan, C. Emotional intelligence and participation in decision-making: Strategies for promoting organizational learning and change. Strategic Change, vol. 13 / issue 2, pp. 95–105, 2004.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The SSA Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

SWS Social Sciences and Arts conference
SWS Social Sciences & Arts

Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities

The joint SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities, bringing together research in society, culture, education, law, economics, humanities and the arts.

Visit sgemsocial.org
SWS Vienna When Science Meets Art
SWS Vienna - When Science Meets Art

Social Sciences, Science Meets Art

The Vienna platform for Social Sciences, interdisciplinary research and the dialogue between science, art, society and culture.

Visit sgemvienna.org
SWS Italy The Renaissance Reimagined
SWS Italy - The Renaissance Reimagined

Arts and Humanities, Renaissance Studies

The SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Arts and Humanities in Italy, Florence and Bologna, focused on culture, history, heritage, literature, philosophy, art and humanistic research.

Visit sgemitaly.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

SWS scientific publications gain international visibility through a broad network of scholarly indexing and abstracting databases, citation-tracking services, research discovery platforms, and academic repositories.

Depending on the platform, our publications may be accessible as indexed bibliographic records, abstracts, citation data, DOI-linked metadata, or full-text scientific papers. Coverage and availability vary across platforms and publication years.