SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

DEVELOPING METACOGNITION WITH AN ACTION RESEARCH INTERVENTION: RESULTS FROM HUNGARIAN ENVIRONMENTS

Istvan Zsigmond, Agnes Balint

First published: 2024https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2024/s08/51View metrics

Abstract

Metacognition has been acknowledged as a key component of self-regulation and has also a multidimensional nature, with at least three components: (a) metacognition as theory of mind, (b) metacognition as epistemic thinking, and (c) metacognition as knowledge and regulation of our cognitive self. In an Erasmus+ collaborative project a multicomponent metacognitive training course for teachers was developed incorporating metacognitive knowledge and skills, adopting the principles of action research. The intervention’s aim with respect to developing metacognitive skills was to inform teachers of recent research findings showing the importance of metacognitive abilities for learning and critical thinking and to present possible teaching approaches that can be incorporated into their everyday teaching practice to support the development of metacognitive thinking. Results indicate that 9–12-year-old children benefit from a two-week training in metacognitive knowledge and comprehension as indicated by the increased number of children with higher metacognitive monitoring skills.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
DEVELOPING METACOGNITION WITH AN ACTION RESEARCH INTERVENTION: RESULTS FROM HUNGARIAN ENVIRONMENTS
Authors
Istvan Zsigmond, Agnes Balint
Proceedings
Proceedings of 11th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2024
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2024
Pages
167-174
SWS Citekey
Zsigmond202414167174
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-14-9
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References1
  1. ] Wellman, H.M., Understanding the psychological world: developing a theory of mind, in The Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, U. Goswami, Editor. 2002, Blackwell.: Oxford. [2.] Wang, M.C., G.D. Haertel, and H.J. Walberg, What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 1990. 84(1): p. 30-43. [3.] Veenman, M.V.J., J.J. Elshout, and J. Meijer, The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning And Instruction, 1997. 7(2): p. 187-209. [4.] Verschaffel, L., et al., Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1999. 1(3): p. 195-229. [5.] Pressley, M., What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of?, in Kamil, Michael L. (Ed); Mosenthal, Peter B. (Ed); et al. (2000). Handbook of reading research, Vol. III. (pp. 545 561). 2000. [6.] Thomas, K.F. and M.A. Barksdale Ladd, Metacognitive processes: Teaching strategies in literacy education courses. Reading Psychology, 2000. 21(1): p. 67-84. [7.] Zsigmond, I. Fostering Metacognition in the Elementary School Classroom. in LUMEN: Rethinking Social Action. Core Values 2016. Iasi, Romania: Medimond, Bologna. [8.] Lederer, J.M., Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal Of Learning Disabilities, 2000. 33(1): p. 91-106. [9.] van Kraayenoord, C.E. and W.E. Schneider, Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4. European Journal Of Psychology Of Education, 1999. 14(3): p. 305-324. [10.] Myers, M. and S.G. Paris, Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 1978. 70(5): p. 680-690. [11.] Cavanaugh, J.C. and M. Perlmutter, Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 1982. 53(1): p. 11-28. [12.] Gascoine, L., S. Higgins, and K. Wall, The assessment of metacognition in children aged 4–16 years: a systematic review. Review of Education, 2017. 5(1): p. 3- 57. [13.] Oakhill, J., J. Hartt, and D. Samols, Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and writing, 2005. 18: p. 657-686. [14.] Markman, E.M., Realizing you don?t understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 1979. 50: p. 643-655. [15.] Roebers, C.M., et al., The role of children’s metacognitive experiences for cue utilization and monitoring accuracy: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 2019. 55(10): p. 2077.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list