Scholarly record
SUPPORTING LEARNING ROMANIAN BEYOND THE CLASSROOM – ROMANIAN AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE, A CASE STUDY
Abstract
Before the pandemic that burst out in 2019, most language teachers noticed that students learn more efficiently when they combine classroom learning with learning outside the classroom. In Romania, this concept is quite new when we think of higher education, where students have been accustomed to learning in more formal environments, such as labs or classrooms. As for learning a foreign language outside the classroom, there are no studies that report on the effectiveness of learning outside this so-called safe environment. This idea occurred due to the restrictions imposed during Covid-19 when I thought of ways to take students out of the virtual environment and bring them into a safer scenario where they could feel comfortable and interact with each other. Most language teachers have noticed that students learn more efficiently when they combine classroom leaning with learning outside the conventional environment. In Romania, this concept is quite new when we think about higher education. In this context, students believe that learning is more efficient in a more formal environment, e.g. labs, classrooms. As for learning out of the classroom, there are no studies that report on the effectiveness of learning outside the classroom. Having very few options, I did not even think that out-of-class learning might be less effective than classroom learning, and I could gladly observe the positive aspects of learning beyond the classroom. This present paper will be focused mainly on the benefits of learning outside the classroom and the importance of learner autonomy. The examples provided come from the Preparatory Year of Romanian Language, where Romanian is taught as a foreign language.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References21
Benson, P. (2011c). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). London: Pearson. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Teaching+and+researching+autonomy &author=Benson+P.&publication+year=2011.
Benson, P.&Nunan, D.(eds.) (2005). Learners’ stories: Difference and diversity in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Learners%E2%80%99+stories%3A+D ifference+and+diversity+in+language+learning&author=Benson+P.&author=Nunan+D. &publication+year=2005.
Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 65(1), 24-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540- 4781.1981.tb00949.x
Block, D. (2007). Second language identities. New York: Continuum. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Second+language+identities&author= Block+D.&publication+year=2007
Borg, S. & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. ELT Research Paper 12-07. London: British Council. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Learner+autonomy%3A+English+lang uage+teachers%E2%80%99+beliefs+and+practices&author=Borg+S.&author=AlBusaidi+S.&publication+year=2012
Field, J. (2007). Looking outwards, not inwards. ELT Journal, 61(1), 30- 38.DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccl042
Fullan, M. (2006). Change Theory. A force for school improvement. Centre for Strategic Education. Seminar Series Paper No. 157
Gardner, D., & Miller, L. (1999). Establishing self-access: From theory to practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Harding-Esch, E. M. (1982). The open access sound and video library of the University of Cambridge: Progress report and development. System, 10(1), 13-28. DOI: 10.1016/0346-251x(81)90063-4
Kato, S., & Mynard, J. (2017). Reflective dialogue: Advising in language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kuure, L. (2011). Places for learning: Technology-mediated language learning practices beyond the classroom. In Benson, P. & Reinders, H. (eds.), 35–46. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Places+for+learning%3A +Technology-mediated+language+learning+practices+beyond+the+classroom&btnG=
Lai, C. (2015). Perceiving and traversing in-class and out-of-class learning: Accounts from foreign language learners in Hong Kong. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 265-284. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2014.918982
Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the quality of out-of-class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278-308. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.171
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. London, UK: Routledge.
Menezes, V. (2011). Affordances for language learning beyond the classroom. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 59-71). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morrison, B. (2011). A framework for the evaluation of a self-access language learning centre. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(4), 241-256. Retrieved from https://sisaljournal.org/archives/dec11/morrison/
Murray, G., Fujishima, N., & Uzuka, M. (2014). The semiotics of place: Autonomy and space. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 81-99). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murray, G., & Lamb, T. E. (Eds.). (2017). Space, place and autonomy in language learning. London, UK: Routledge.
Tomalin, B. & Stempleski, S. (1993). Cultural Awareness. Oxford University Press.
Whipple, W. R. Collaborative Learning: Recognizing It When We See It. AAHE Bulletin (1987): 4-6. (ED 289 396).
Wong, L., & Nunan, D. C. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 32(9), 144-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2011.05.004.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

