SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

LITOTES AS A MEANS OF MITIGATING COMMUNICATIVE AGGRESSION

Elena Monakhova

First published: 2023https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2023/s10.47View metrics

Abstract

The importance of communication in society is invaluable for modern science. Aggression, expressed in verbal and non-verbal forms, produces a particularly significant effect on the effectiveness of communication. There is no doubt, however, that communicative aggression can in no way serve the success of communication. Modern research is aimed at identifying strategies, tactics and lexical units, the use of which allows communicants to have successful and effective communication. The communicative category of mitigation is of increasing interest to researchers and is regarded within the framework of pragmalinguistics. The implementation of the mitigation strategy is implemented, among other things, through meiotic means, combining euphemisms, meiotisms and litotes. The peculiarity of litotes lies in its ability to be used for controversial purposes. The contradictory nature of litotes significantly broadens its application and widens the meanings it can reveal. Litotes is used to express both understated and categorical statements, the importance and modesty of something or someone, to sound polite and ironic or sarcastic, to convey admiration and disapproval, to accept a compliment or express insult. One of the functions litotes performs is mitigating a negative description of a person or an object. It makes litotes a device with a huge pragmatic capacity that can be used in all types of discourses, especially in such manipulative and argumentative ones as political and publicistic, thus, achieving the effect of softening the categorical nature of assessments.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2

Publication details

Title
LITOTES AS A MEANS OF MITIGATING COMMUNICATIVE AGGRESSION
Authors
Elena Monakhova
Proceedings
Proceedings of 10th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2023
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2023
Pages
635-641
SWS Citekey
Monakhova202310111
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-06-4
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References16
  1. Arutyunova N.D., Paducheva E.V. (1985). Origins, problems and categories of pragmatics//New issues in foreign linguistics. Vol. 16.

  2. Beard Рђ. (2000). The language of politics, London; N.Y.: Routledge.

  3. Bousfield D., Locher M.A. (2008). Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  4. Caffi РЎ. (2007). Mitigation. Studies in Pragmatics. Elsevier.

  5. Caldas-Coulthard C.R. (2013). Texts and practices: readings in critical discourse analysis. Routledge.

  6. Chudinov A.P. (2016). Theory and methodology of linguistic analysis of a political text. Ekaterinburg.

  7. Fairclough N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

  8. Fraser B. (1980). Mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics. в„– 31.

  9. Gratch J., Mao W., Marsella S., Martinovski B. (2005). Mitigation Theory: An Integrated Approach. The Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

  10. Kostomarov V.G. (2005) Our language in action: essays on modern Russian stylistics. Moscow: Gardariki.

  11. Kubryakova E.S. (2000). On the concepts of discourse and discursive analysis in modern linguistics. Discourse, speech, speech activity: functional and structural aspects: collection of reviews / RAN INION.

  12. Leech G. (1983) Principles of pragmatics. London; New York: Longman.

  13. Makarov M.L. (2003). Fundamentals of discourse theory. Moscow: ITDGK В«GnosisВ».

  14. McCutcheon E. (1977). Denying the contrary: More’s use of litotes in the Utopia/Essential articles for the study of Thomas More, ed. R.S.Sylvester and G.P.Marc’hadour, Hamden, Conn.:Archon Books.

  15. Takhtarova S.S. (2010). The category of communicative mitigation (cognitivediscursive and ethnocultural aspects): dissertation… D. Philol. Sciences: 10.02.19. Volgograd.

  16. Vorontsova Рў.Рђ. (2006). Speech aggression: communicative-discursive approach. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philology, Chelyabinsk.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list