SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

RISK TAKING AMONG YOUNG DRIVERS AND CULTURAL VALUES

A. Gheorghiu, D. Victoria Zaharia, M. Cristea

First published: 2017https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/32/S11.042View metrics

Abstract

Cultural differences have always been observed in the way that drivers act suggesting that in part, the cultural aspects could bring an insight into risky driving behaviors. Two hundred and five drivers from 3 countries (Morocco, N=30; France, N=87; Romania, N-=88) have taken part into an exploratory study aiming to analyze how various cultural values might have an impact on risky driving behavior and driving anger. Participants had in average 22 years (SD=2.12, min=18, max=25), had had their driving license for 3.22 years in average (SD=2.06, min=<1year, max=7 years) and reported, on average, less than one accident (65.3% of them had had no accident until the time of the study). All participants answered an online questionnaire comprising measures of values (Individual Values Scale, Schwartz 1992 and Value Survey Module, Hofstede 1984), of risky driving behaviors (Driving Behavior Questionnaire, violation scale, Reason, 1999), driving anger (Driving Anger Expression Inventory) and various socio-demographic information. Results show that some risky behaviors correlate with various cultural variables and that values might influence anger expression in drivers.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
RISK TAKING AMONG YOUNG DRIVERS AND CULTURAL VALUES
Authors
A. Gheorghiu, D. Victoria Zaharia, M. Cristea
Proceedings
4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2017
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2017
Pages
331-338
SWS Citekey
Gheorghiu201711331338
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7408-19-5
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References13
  1. World Health Organization, Global status report on road safety: supporting a decade of action, 2013, World Health Organization: Geneva.

  2. World Health Organization, Global status report on road safety 2015, 2015, World Health Organization: Geneva.

  3. Lajunen, T. and D. Parker, Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. Accident; analysis and prevention, 2001. 33(2): p. 243-55.

  4. Gheorghiu, A., P. Delhomme, and M.L. Felonneau, Peer pressure and risk taking in young drivers’ speeding behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015. 35: p. 101-111.

  5. Boyer, T.W., The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 2006. 26(3): p. 291-345.

  6. Schwartz, S.H., Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values1994: Sage Publications, Inc.

  7. Fischer, R. and S. Schwartz, Whence differences in value priorities? Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 2011. 42(7): p. 1127-1144.

  8. Ashraf, B.N., C. Zheng, and S. Arshad, Effects of national culture on bank risk-taking behavior. Research in International Business and Finance, 2016. 37: p. 309-326.

  9. Hofstede, G., National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 1983. 13(1-2): p. 46-74.

  10. Schwartz and L. Sagiv, Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1995. 26(1): p. 92-116.

  11. Sârbescu, P., Aggressive driving in Romania: Psychometric properties of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2012. 15(5): p. 556-564.

  12. Reason, J., et al., Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? Ergonomics, 1990. 33(10): p. 1315 - 1332.

  13. Lheureux, F., Speeding or not speeding? When subjective assessment of safe, pleasurable and risky speeds determines speeding behaviour. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2012. 4(1): p. 79.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The SSA Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

SWS Social Sciences and Arts conference
SWS Social Sciences & Arts

Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities

The joint SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities, bringing together research in society, culture, education, law, economics, humanities and the arts.

Visit sgemsocial.org
SWS Vienna When Science Meets Art
SWS Vienna - When Science Meets Art

Social Sciences, Science Meets Art

The Vienna platform for Social Sciences, interdisciplinary research and the dialogue between science, art, society and culture.

Visit sgemvienna.org
SWS Italy The Renaissance Reimagined
SWS Italy - The Renaissance Reimagined

Arts and Humanities, Renaissance Studies

The SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Arts and Humanities in Italy, Florence and Bologna, focused on culture, history, heritage, literature, philosophy, art and humanistic research.

Visit sgemitaly.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications