Scholarly record
TUTOR SKETCHES AS A METHOD FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO INTERACTION IN PUBLIC TUTORIALS
Abstract
Although the studio based learning in architectural education is founded on the interaction between the tutor and the design student, there are few studies on the means and methods to facilitate this interaction. The well-known methods are one to one and public tutorials and from the tutors' side, all function for articulating what they think is important for the effective development of the student project. Within the specific system of limited guidance in the final semester design studio at Gazi University, Department of Architecture, this study presents a critical look at minimal guidance and the potentials of tutor sketches in public tutorials. Through case study examples it demonstrates the role of tutor sketches as means for reflection, assessment and provocation in the public tutorials of architectural design studio on achieving an overall quality of work and an educative design experience.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References12
Akin, Ö. Case-based instruction strategies in architecture, Design Studies, vol. 23/issue 4, pp 407-431, 2002.
Anthony, K. H. Designing for diversity: Implications for architectural education in the twenty-first century, Journal of Architectural Education, vol.55/issue 4, pp 257-267, 2002.
Goldschmidt, G. Expert knowledge or creative spark? Predicaments in design education, Expertise in Design, Design Thinking Research Symposium, Vol. 6, pp 17-19, 2003, November.
Goldschmidt, G. & Smolkov, M. Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance, Design Studies, vol. 27/issue 5, pp 549-569, 2006.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching, Educational Psychologist, vol. 41/issue 2, pp 75-86, 2006.
Kumkale Açıkgöz, E. Uncovering Creativity: Structuring experience in architectural design studio, Open House International, vol.40/issue 2, 2015.
Salama, A. M. A theory for integrating knowledge in architectural design education, ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 2/issue 1, pp 100-128, 2008.
Salama, A. M., & El-Attar, M. S. Student perceptions of the architectural design jury. Archnet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research, pp 174-200, 2010, July and November.
Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006), Educational Psychologist, vol.42/issue 2, pp 91-97, 2007.
Schön, D. A. The architectural studio as an exemplar of education for reflection-in-action, Journal of Architectural Education, vol. 38/issue 1, pp 2-9, 1984.
Webster, H. Facilitating critically reflective learning: excavating the role of the design tutor in architectural education, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, vol. 2/issue 3, pp 101-111, 2004.
Wilkin, M. Reviewing the review, Changing architectural education: Towards a new professionalism, Ed. David Nicol & Simon Pilling, NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 85 – 90, 2005.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
