SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

ACCESSIBILITY AS A CRITERION OF EVALUATING THE PUBLIC SPACES

J. Wiszniowski

First published: 2017https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2017/HB51/S17.004View metrics

Abstract

The focus of the research is accessibility of the public space designated in the legal documents generating social policy of Wroclaw city. Integration and expansion of social development constitute one of the main objectives of economic development, both at the national and local level. Spatial planning should satisfy basic social needs and provide room to interpersonal relationships. Accessibility is one of the most important features defining areas of public space. Depending on various points of view from which accessibility can be considered, one will notice its different aspects. The cognitive aim is to establish the criteria of accessibility resulting from legal requirements and planning practice. In practice, the research defines the basic functional and spatial conditions that meet the requirements of available space. This can be used to verify the decisions taken to designate areas of public space. The determinant of accessibility is one of the most important criteria of evaluating areas of the public spaces as places of social activity. In social terms, this is primarily a space available for communication, defined in three ways: demonstrations and exchange of views, the media content stored in the location, form and space equipment, and, finally community share production of space as a result of the agreement based on the public dialogue. In material terms, it is openness and accessibility for all users, regardless of affiliation, wealth, the degree of physical or intellectual, which constitute an important attribute of the public space. On the example of the policy of spatial development of Wroclaw, we can notice some tendencies to treat large transport junctions in the city and big shopping centres and service as the most important elements of the system areas of the public space. Simultaneously, the functional, spatial and proprietary features of these places mostly do not meet the conditions for general accessibility. Therefore, we must conclude that the area occupied by the road infrastructure, or serving as the transport facilities (such as car parks) and commercial activities (such as shopping centers) cannot be automatically included in the integration sites, but should be evaluated in terms of their characteristics, whether they are appropriate to the tasks defined in the definition of areas of the public space.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
ACCESSIBILITY AS A CRITERION OF EVALUATING THE PUBLIC SPACES
Authors
J. Wiszniowski
Proceedings
4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017, www.sgemvienna.org, SGEM2017 Conference Proceedings, ISBN 978-619-7105-96-4 / ISSN 2367-5659, March 28-31, Book5, Vol.1, 29-36 pp, DOI:10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2017/HB
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2017
Pages
29-36
SWS Citekey
Wiszniowski2017172936
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7105-96-4
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
ReferencesPending
Pendingreferences will be imported from Crossref/SWS source data

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list