SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

HISTORICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE REPRODUCTION OF AXIOLOGY OF NATURE IN UKRAINIAN PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION: METHODOLOGICAL REFERENCE POINTS

T.S. Troitska, A.M. Krylova, G.G. Taranenko, E.M. Troitska, O.V. Popravko

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCAH.2019.1/S09.015View metrics

Abstract

The research aim is to define and substantiate the methodological guidelines for the historical reconstruction of Ukrainian philosophical tradition of axiology of the nature. First of all, the research methodology as a synthesized self-reflection of historical humanities, in the search for new knowledge, should be based on human-centered approaches, principles and methods and it has to take into account evolutionary changes in the world society, the conceptual and historical-contextual influence on human consciousness. In the article on the basis of philosophical, general scientific and specific historical methodology, with the help of historical-genetic and historical-comparative methods, there have been explicated the new guidelines for the theoretical reconstruction of the eco-friendly tradition of the Ukrainian people, presented as the value-semantic concentrated form by the philosophical anthropological thought. The scientific novelty is that historical reconstruction at all levels of the methodology is presented as a construct of axiological reproduction of the cultural memory of the people, in particular its value-semantic relation to nature: analyzed analytical and phenomenological methods of studying the problem; Interpreted the value-semantic potential of the axiology of nature G. Skovoroda, M. Gogol, I. Franko, V. Vernadsky, who long before the "cataclysms" in the system "nature - society" formed the ideas of co-evolution, genetic priority, ecological imperative, ethics of responsibility. The study proves the need to rethink the value-normative method of understanding the value of nature, the transition to a cognitive-communicative method of acquiring new knowledge and a wide range of scientific procedures. In the article, the current requirements to historical humanities are defined as the orientation to postmetaphysical thinking, linguistic turn, the specification of the reason and rejection from the advantages of theory over practice. All of this enables the theoretical reconstruction of the domestic philosophical tradition and renews the cultural memory of the people, in particular, the value-semantic attitude of man to the nature. The analytical and phenomenological methods, taking into account the living world and ethno-cultural variability of the value-normative method, cognitive-communicative process of acquiring the new knowledge ensure the correction of value determinants for modern humans. The axiological positions of G. Skovoroda, I. Franko, V. Vernadsky in defining the ecological determinants of the development of the "Man-Nature" system must be recognized as a movement to advance. Keywords: analytical methods, axiology, eco-friendly tradition, culrural memory, methodology, noosphere, phenomelogical methods, reconstruction.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
HISTORICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE REPRODUCTION OF AXIOLOGY OF NATURE IN UKRAINIAN PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION: METHODOLOGICAL REFERENCE POINTS
Authors
T.S. Troitska, A.M. Krylova, G.G. Taranenko, E.M. Troitska, O.V. Popravko
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Arts and Humanities ISCAH 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
107-114
SWS Citekey
Troitska20199107114
ISSN
2682-9940
ISBN
978-619-7408-90-4
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Boreyko V.Y. Proryv v ekologicheskuyu etiku. – K.: KEKTs, 2013. – 168 p. [in Russian].

  2. Buryak V.V. «Dinamika kultury v epokhu globalizatsii: noosfernyy kontekst»: monografiya /V.V. Buryak. – Simferopol: DIAYPI, 2011. – 462 p. [in Russian].

  3. Bereziuk D.O., Rachynska K.O. Liudyna ta pryroda. Etapy vzaiemodii. – Elektronnyi resurs: library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/…/4/1/10H3R10_2htm – pp.198 – 206 [in Ukrainian].

  4. Franko, I. (1986). Collection of works in 50 volumes. Kyiv, Naukova dumka. [in Ukrainian].

  5. Gorskyi, V. S., Kyslyuk, K. V. (2004). Istoriia ukrainskoyi filosofiyi [History of Ukranian philosophy]. – Kyiv, Lybid. [in Ukrainian].

  6. Habermas, J. (1973). Handlungen, Sprechakten, sprachlich vermittelte Interaktionen und Lebenswelt. Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. pp. 63–104. [in German].

  7. Habermas, J. (1988). Die Einheit der Vernunft in der Vielfalt ihrer Stimmen. Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. pp. 153–186. [in German].

  8. Ivangorodskyi, K. (2018). Metodologichni aspekty rekonstruktsyi etnichnoyi istoriyi shidnykh slovian u suchasniy urkainskyi istoriografiyi [Methodological aspects of reconstruction of ethnic history of eastern Slavonic people in modern Ukrainian historiography]. East European Historical Bulletin, 2018, N 9. pp. 146–153. DOI: 10.24919/2519-058x.9.150357. [in Ukrainian].

  9. Krysachenko, V. S. (1998). Lyudyna i biosfera: osnovy ekologichnoyi antropologyi [Human and biosphere: foundamentals of ecological anthropology]. Kyiv, Zapovit. [in Ukrainian].

  10. Nevmerzhytska, O. (2017). Vyznachennia kategoriyi “tsinnost’” do istoriografiyi problemy [Defining the categogy “value”: to historiography of problem]. East European Historical Bulletin, 2017, N 4. pp. 15–23. DOI: 10.24919/2519- 058x.4.111456. [in Ukrainian].

  11. Proliyev S. V. (2014). “Suspilstvo znann’” iak antropologichna sytuatsiya [“Society of knowledge” as anthropological situation]. Philosophy of education, 2014, N 1, pp. 7–23.

  12. Skovoroda, H. S. (2005). Rozmova piaty podorozhnikh pro istynne schastia v zhyttia v 2-k tomakh. [Talk offive travelers on true happiness in life]. [Works in 2 volumes. Vol. 1]. Kyiv, Publishing House Oberegy. [in Ukrainian].

  13. Troitska, O. M. (2016). Dialog I tolerantnist u kulturno-osvitniomy prostori vyschoyi shkoly [Dialogue and tolerance in cultural-educational space of higher school]. Melitopol, Publishing Company of B. Khmelnytsky Melitopol Pedagogical University. [in Ukrainian].

  14. Troitska, T. S. (2016). Axiology of nature as a spiritual answer to the challenges of sustainable development. In Molodychenko V. V., Oleksenko R. I. Axiological survey of the modern cultural-educational practices of personality (p. 49–69). Melitopol: Bohdan Khmelnytsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University Press. [in English]

  15. Vernadskyi, V. I. (1988). Filosofskie mysli naturalista [Philosophical thoughts of a naturalis]. Moskva, Nauka. [in Russian].

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list