SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

COMMUNICATIVE AND CULTURAL MEMORY AND FEATURES OF ITS INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION: RESEARCH METHODS

A. Sumskaya

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCSS.2019.5/S16.016View metrics

Abstract

Currently there is a clearly expressed public need for organizing intergenerational communication in the digital environment with the purpose of transmitting cultural memory of the older (“analog”) generation. Such transmission determines the possibility of memory perception by the “digital” generation in the process of its socialization and realization of their cultural identity. The article is devoted to the development of methodology and private methods of research of communicative-cultural memory and features of its transmission from the “analog” to the “digital” generation of Russians. Based on the Jan and Aleida Assmann’s memory theory, the authors concluded that communicative-cultural memory is used in the digital environment in every moment of communication. This type of memory is syncretic; it provides the integrity of perception, but it also transforms, unlike the "frozen forms" of cultural memory. It is determined that the synergistic effect of the study of communicative-cultural memory and features of its transmission can be achieved as a result of the application of socio-communicative, cognitive and structural-semiotic methodological approaches, as well as socio-culturological and linguistic methods.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
COMMUNICATIVE AND CULTURAL MEMORY AND FEATURES OF ITS INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION: RESEARCH METHODS
Authors
A. Sumskaya
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences ISCSS 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
129-136
SWS Citekey
Sumskaya201916129136
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7408-95-9
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Assmann J. Communicative and Cultural Memory. Cultural Memories Knowledge and Space 4, 3 Eds. P. Meusburger et al., Springer Science+Business. Media B.V. 2011, pp. 15-27. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8945-8-1.

  2. Assmann J. Collective Memory and Cultural Identity New German Critique, No. 65 pp. 125-133. 1995.

  3. Assmann A. Dlinnaya ten' proshlogo. Memorial'naya kul'tura i istoricheskayapolitika [The long shadow of the past. Memorial culture and historical politics], Moscow, New Literary Review, 187 СЂСЂ.13-151, 2014. (In Russian).

  4. Sumskaya A. S., Sumskoy P. F. Modelirovaniye telenovostey v kontekste informatsionnoy politiki telekanala [Modeling of TV News in the Context of Information Policy of a Television Channel] Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 596, 2018. DOI: 10.17150/2308-6203.2018.7(4). 581– 598. (In Russian).

  5. Van Dijck J. Mediated memories: personal cultural memory as object of cultural analysis. Continuum, Issue 18(2), pp. 261-277. (2004) DOI: 10.1080/1030431042000215040.

  6. Gracia J. P., Rius-Ulldemolins J. Digitalization of the cultural field and cultural intermediaries: A social critique of digital utopianism Revista Espanola de Investigaciones Sociologicas Issue 162, pp. 73-89, 2018DOI: 10.5477/cis/reis.162.73.

  7. Rigney A. Plenitude, scarcity and the circulation of cultural memory. Journal of European studies, Issue 35(1), p.26. 2005. DOI: 10.1080/13825570600753394.

  8. Tamm M. History as cultural memory: Mnemohistory and the construction of the Estonian nation. Journal of Baltic Studies, Issue 39(4), pp. 499-516, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/01629770802468865.

  9. Middleton D. Succession and change in the sociocultural use of memory: Buildingin the past in communicative action. Culture & Psychology, Issue 8(1), pp. 79-95, 2002.

  10. Simons G., Westerlund D. (2016). Religion, politics and nation-building in postcommunist countries. New York: Routledge, 219 p.

  11. VolДЌiДЌ Z. Yugo-nostalgia: Cultural memory and media in the former Yugoslavia. Critical studies in media communication, Issue 24(1), pp. 21-38, 2007. DOI: 10.1080/07393180701214496

  12. Sokolov A. V. Obshchaya teoriya sotsial'noy kommunikatsii [General theory of social communication], St. Petersburg, Publishing house of V. A. Mikhailov, 461 p., 2002 (In Russian)

  13. Fedotova N. G. Simvolicheskiy capital mesta: ponyatiye, osobennosti nakopleniya, metodiki issledovaniya [Symbolic capital of a place: concept, features of accumulation, research methodology] Tomsk State University Bulletin, no. 29, pp. 141-155, 2018. DOI: 10.17223 / 22220836/29/13.

  14. Davis C. H. & Michelle C. Q methodology in audience research: Bridging the qualitative/quantitative ‘divide’. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, Vol.8(2), pp.527-561, 2011.

  15. Mukhin M. YU. Netipichnaya leksicheskaya sochetayemost': formalizatsiya termina i analiz teksta [Atypical lexical compatibility: formalization of the term and text analysis], Ural Philological Journal, no.1, pp.105-115. 2015. (In Russian).

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list