Scholarly record
TIME MODELS AND HERITAGE PRESERVATION
Abstract
In this article, I discuss the category of time in light of heritage preservation. Although change is central to the conservation theory, it is also a concept that raises the greatest doubts and ambiguous interpretations. The reason for this is very simple: change is related to as foundational a concept as time. In this article, I use metaphysical time models to analyse the life course of things, their damage, and in the end I also refer to conservation theories derived from Eugène Viollet-le-Duc and John Ruskin. The essential difference between the conservation theories discussed here lies in their attitudes toward time, and the related problems of object authenticity and identity. In the framework of the presentist model, it is not possible to solve the main contradiction connected to restoration. Stylistic restoration ruined the authenticity of buildings as historic documents; however without restoration, the objects would have been destroyed and thereby also lost their historic value. However, it is possible to find a solution to this dilemma based on the eternalist time model, which helps connect heritage to contemporary time, and avoid its physical, legal, and mental separation from everyday life of society. The fact that considering objects as part of heritage could damage them instead of preserving them should also not be overlooked. The authenticity of an object is not related to any ideal state in its history but to a conceptual, factual and actual state in its wholeness.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References14
Miller, K., Presentism, Eternalism, and the Growing Block, A Companion to the Philosophy of Time, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 345–364;
Appelbaum, B., Conservation Treatment Methodology, Amsterdam, Boston et al.: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007.
Brandi, C., Teoria del restauro, Turin: Einaudi, 2000.
Pevsner, N., Ruskin and Viollet-le-Duc: Englishness and Frenchness in the Appreciation of Gothic Architecture, London: Thames and Hudson, 1969.
Viollet-le-Duc, E., On Restoration, London: Sampson Low, Marston Low, and Searle, 1875, pp. 9;
Viollet-le-Duc, E., On Restoration, London: Sampson Low, Marston Low, and Searle, 1875, pp. 13;
Viollet-le-Duc, E., On Restoration, London: Sampson Low, Marston Low, and Searle, 1875, pp. 36;
Arrhenius, Th., The Fragile Monument– On Conservation and Modernity, London: Artifice Books, 2012, pp. 63–64;
Vinegar, A., Viollet-le-Duc and Restoration on the Future Anterior, Future Anterior, vol. 3, issue 2, 2006, pp. 55–65;
Ruskin, J. The Seven Lamps of Architecture, London: The Waverley Book Company, n.d., pp. 195;
Ruskin, J. The Seven Lamps of Architecture, London: The Waverley Book Company, n.d., pp. 206;
Ruskin, J. The Seven Lamps of Architecture, London: The Waverley Book Company, n.d., pp. 203;
Arrhenius, Th., The Fragile Monument– On Conservation and Modernity, London: Artifice Books, 2012, pp. 84;
Syein, R., Unstable Foundations: Ruskin and the Costs of Modernity, Ruskin and Modernism, Palgrave, 2001, pp.1–16.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
