SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

EFFICIENCY OF IMPLEMENTING THE MANAGEMENT OF NEW PROTECTED AREAS

C. C. Stingu Palici, V. Nedeff, I. Sandu, N. Barsan, M. O. Antonovici Munteanu

First published: 2020https://doi.org/10.5593/sws.iscss.v2020.7.2/s04.03View metrics

Abstract

In order to preserve and improve the value of protected areas it's needed the management for which they have been designated. Management actions have shown that they cannot always be effective. The changes are generated by random causes: environmental transformation, new threats or other factors. Activities planned or carried out in the protected area are considered threats only if they affect or degrade the values for which the protected area was established. In the initial phase, understanding the evaluation of management actions, their incidence and correction are essential elements for the efficient management of protected areas. Because we work with complex systems, the correction of some management actions can take a long time. The application of well-targeted corrections is necessary following the findings of a management that has not been properly planned or for adapting to new conditions. Therefore, the continuous and careful evaluation of the results / impact of our activities in the protected area, as well as taking measures at an early stage to improve these activities, should be an integral part of day-to-day management. The monitoring and reporting systems transmit efficient images and data, which will contribute to the sustained achievement of an operative, conclusive and transparent management. Monitoring gives the best results when it can be considered an essential activity of the organization and when it enjoys important support from the authorities and stakeholders. The use of evaluation results provide relevant information, being essential for of protected area management. Assessing the efficiency of protected area management is a positive tool, which helps managers in their work and is not perceived as a system of supervision and penalty for inappropriate results.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1

Publication details

Title
EFFICIENCY OF IMPLEMENTING THE MANAGEMENT OF NEW PROTECTED AREAS
Authors
C. C. Stingu Palici, V. Nedeff, I. Sandu, N. Barsan, M. O. Antonovici Munteanu
Proceedings
7th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2020
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2020
Pages
23-30
SWS Citekey
StinguPalici202042330
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7603-15-6
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References14
  1. Dudley, N., (Editor), Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories Gland, Switzwerland, IUCN, 2008.

  2. Lockwood, M., Graeme, L.W., Kothari, A., Managing Protected Areas – A Global Guide, Routledge, 2006.

  3. Stingu (Palici), C.C., Nedeff, V., Sandu, I., Spiridon (Ursu), P., Gurlui, S.O., Sandu, I.G., Antonovici (Munteanu), M.O., Vasilache, V., Modern methods for the valorisation of protected areas in Iasi county. Their monitoring and management with GIS technology, Acta Geobalcanica, Macedonia, vol.7/issue 2, 2021, pp. 57-65;

  4. Myers, N., Mittermeler, R.A., Mittermeler, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B., Kent, J., Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities, Nature, vol. 403, issue 6772, pp. 853-858, DOI: 10.1038/35002501, 2000.

  5. Etter, A., Andrade, A., Nelson, C.R., CortГ©s, J., Saavedra, K., Assessing restoration priorities for high-risk ecosystems: An application of the IUCN red list of ecosystems, Land Use Policy, vol. 99, Article number 104874, 2020.

  6. Holl, K.D., Aide, T.M., When and where to actively restore ecosystems?, Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 261, issue 10, pp. 1558-1563. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004, 2011.

  7. Oyafuso, Z.S., Leung, P., Franklin, E.C., Understanding biological and socioeconomic tradeoffs of marine reserve planning via a flexible integer linear programming approach, Biological Conservation, vol. 241, Article number 108319, DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108319, 2020.

  8. Raymond, C.M., Fazey, I., Reed, M.S., Stringer, L.C., Robinson, G.M., Evely,A.C.,Integrating Local and Scientific Knowledge, Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, vol. 91, issue 8, 1766-1777, 2010.

  9. Wiens, J.A., Hobbs, R.J.,Integrating conservation and restoration in a changing world, BioScience, vol. 65, issue3, pp. 302-312, DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu235, 2015.

  10. Chun, J., Kim, C.-K., Kim, G.S., Jeong, J., Lee, W.-K., Social big data informsspatially explicit management options for national parks with high tourism pressures,Tourism Management, vol. 81, Article number 104136, 2020.

  11. Tanentzap, A.J., Lamb, A., Walker, S., Farmer, A., Resolving Conflicts betweenAgriculture and the Natural Environment, PLoS Biology, vol. 13, issue 9, Articlenumber e1002242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002242, 2015.

  12. Raven, P.H. Williams, T. (Editor), Nature and Human Society. The Quest for aSustainable World, National Academy Press, Washington, 1991.

  13. Montanarella, L., Panagos, P., The relevance of sustainable soil managementwithin the European Green Deal, Land Use Policy, vol. 100, Article number 104950,2021.

  14. Spiridon, P., Sandu, I., Conservation of the Cultural Heritage: Fromparticipation to collaboration, ENCATC Journal of Cultural Management & Policy,2015(5), pp. 43-53.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list