Scholarly record
NEUROMYTHS AND COGNITIVE HEALTH: A STUDY WITH SENIOR CITIZENS
Abstract
Neuroscience has witnessed profound scientific and technological advancements over recent decades, transforming our understanding of the brain and leading to significant improvements in both diagnosing and treating neurological disorders. This field of knowledge is an exciting topic for researchers and health professionals, psychologists, educators, and even the general public. The rapid expansion and the complexities of neurosciences have also led to the emergence and spread of several neuromyths. These myths concern various misconceptions or unfounded beliefs arising from incorrect interpretations of neuroscience research and its application in educational settings or other areas. Healthy ageing and maintaining cognitive health are pivotal aspects of life quality in senior populations. As the importance of lifelong education is recognised worldwide, educational endeavours in the form of senior universities play a crucial role in supporting an active and engaged elderly community. This study investigates the prevalence of neuromyths among senior citizens enrolled at senior universities and analyses which attitudes they adopt to maintain their cognitive health. To achieve that purpose, a questionnaire was developed and administered to 64 senior citizens (n=64) enrolled in two senior universities from urban areas in the northern region of Portugal. The questionnaire covered prevalent neuromyths, such as the belief in using only 10% of the brain and other diet-related and cognitive function misconceptions. The results indicate the prevalence of some neuromyths in Portuguese senior citizens attending senior universities. Nevertheless, participants demonstrated some knowledge regarding practices that contribute to good cognitive health. These findings highlight the need for educational outreach and public engagement initiatives by neuroscientists, educators, or science communicators, which can help to demystify brain science and dispel popular neuromyths. By fostering a better understanding of how the brain actually works, we can ensure that the benefits of neuroscience advancements are more fully realised across society and empower individuals to make informed decisions about their cognitive health and well-being.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References16
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S. A., Hudspeth, A. J., Principles of Neural Science, McGraw-Hill Education, 2021
Howard-Jones, P. A., Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 15, pp 817-824, 2015. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3817
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T., Bringing the Neuroscience of Learning to Online Teaching: An Educator's Handbook, Teachers College Press, 2021
Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., McGrath, L. M., Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or Neuroscience Decreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 2017. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., Jolles, J., Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 3, 2012. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
Dundar, S., Gunduz, N., Misconceptions Regarding the Brain: The Neuromyths of Preservice Teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, vol. 10, pp 212-232, 2016. DOI: 10.1111/mbe.12119
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., Willingham, D. T., Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,vol. 14, pp 4-58, 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1529100612453266
Sousa, D. A., How the brain learns, Corwin Press, 2016
Simmonds, A., How neuroscience is affecting education: Report of teacher and parent surveys, Wellcome Trus, 2014
Park, D. C., Lodi-Smith, J., Drew, L., Haber, S., Hebrank, A., Bischof, G. N., Aamodt, W., The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: the Synapse Project. Psychological science, vol. 25, pp 103–112, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613499592
Harada, C. N., Natelson Love, M. C., Triebel, K. L., Normal cognitive aging. Clinics in geriatric medicine, vol. 29, pp 737–752, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.002
Petersen, R. C., Lopez, O., Armstrong, M. J., Getchius, T. S. D., Ganguli, M., Gloss, D., Gronseth, G. S., Marson, D., Pringsheim, T., Day, G. S., Sager, M., Stevens, J., Rae- Grant, A., Practice guideline update summary: Mild cognitive impairment. Neurology, vol. 90, pp 126-135, 2018. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004826
Flexman R., Lifelong Learning: A Key Weapon in Delaware’s Fight AgainstCognitive Decline. Delaware journal of public health, vol. 7, pp. 124-127, 2021. DOI: 10.32481/djph.2021.09.015
Formosa, M., The University of the Third Age and Active Ageing, Springer Cham, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21515-6
Nyberg, L., Lovden, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U., Backman, L., Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 16, pp 292-305, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005
Torrijos-Muelas, M., Gonzalez-Villora, S., Bodoque-Osma, A. R., The Persistence of Neuromyths in the Educational Settings: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol, vol. 11, 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.