Scholarly record
COOPERATION IN RESEARCH TEAMS: AN EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL COOPERATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Abstract
Cooperation within organizations has been considered a key asset for organizational performance, effectiveness and overall success. The aim of the present research is to study the psychometric properties of the Organizational Cooperation Questionnaire in a sample of research team members. The innovation of this study is in assessing organizational cooperation in a sample which has not been widely researched. Given its distinctive characteristics of teamwork, goals interdependence and effort coordination, research team members make a powerful and appealing sample group to deepen the research in this field. Therefore, the sample of this study is made up of 639 participants, all researchers from research institutions, of both genders and different ages, with high academic qualifications (52.1% have a PhD and 33.4% have a master degree). The Organizational Cooperation Questionnaire (ORCOQ), proposed by dos Santos, Figueiredo, and Pais [1], has been applied to workers from several sectors, in order to understand its factorial structure. In the present sample of research team members, exploratory factor analysis has revealed good psychometric properties, with a 3-factor solution, responsible for 59.53% of the total variance. This structure is similar to the structure obtained by dos Santos, Figueiredo and Pais [1]. The first factor explains 26.28%, the second 18.92%, and the third 14.33% of the total variance. The first is made up of a set of 13 items, and is named Principles of Cooperative Relationship (?=.920). The second is made up of 7 items and is called Formal cooperation (?=.894). Finally, the third is made up of 4 items and is named Cooperation focused on organizational mission (?=.876). The present study will broaden the scope of research in cooperation providing a suitable instrument to measure it in this specific sector of activity.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
dos Santos, N. R., Figueiredo, C. & Pais, L. The Organizational Cooperation Questionnaire. (2013, submitted).
Argyle, M. & Lu, L. Happiness and Cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(10), 1019-1030, 1991.
Smith, K. G., Carroll, S. J., & Ashford, S. J. Intra- and Interorganizational Cooperation: Toward a Research Agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 7–23, 1995.
Argyle, M. Cooperation, the basis of sociability. London: Routledge, 1991.
Marcus, J., & Le, H. U. Interactive effects of levels of individualism – collectivism on cooperation: A meta-analysis, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 813–834, 2013.
Schalk, R., & Curseu, P. L. Cooperation in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(5), 453–459, 2010.
Ribiere, V., & Walter, C. 10 Years of IC and KM Research – a Content and Citation Analysis, Paper presented at International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, Washington, DC, USA. Academic Conferences & Publishing International Ltd, 2013.
Deutsch, M. Cooperation and conflict resolution: Implications for consulting psychology. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(2), 76–81, 2001.
Gorsuch, R. Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. Using multivariate statistics (4th Ed.). Allyn and Bacon, United States of America, 2001.
Nunnally, J. Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Vieira, A. Cooperation and Knowledge Management in Portuguese local municipalities: Individual and organizational moderators. (Master's Thesis, Universidade de Coimbra, Università di Bologna), 2012.
Fernandes, N. Estudo das qualidades psicométricas do Questionário de Cooperação Organizacional (QCO) em equipas de investigação. (Master's Thesis, Universidade de Évora), 2011.
Gratton, L. Managing integration through cooperation. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 151–158, 2005.
Chen, C. C., Chen, X.-P., & Meindl, J. R. How Can Cooperation Be Fostered? The Cultural Effects of Individualism-Collectivism. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 285-304, 1998.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
