Scholarly record
PROJECTION OF THE CONCEPT OF BIOPOLITICS IN THE LATVIAN NOVEL SERIES "WE. LATVIA, THE 20th CENTURY"
Abstract
Biopolitics is an interdisciplinary field combining biology and politics. It is a study of politics whose subject is life administration according to the residence of citizens in order to secure and sustain the manifold manifestations of human life and order them and to study the strategies and mechanisms by which human life processes are managed according to the knowledge of authoritarian regimes, power and process of subjectivizing [1]. This term was created by Rudolf Kjellen in his work The Great Powers. One of the meanings assigned to the term biopolitics is social and political power over life. Biopolitics is an innovative interdisciplinary concept whose principles can be formulated by opening up different perspectives and comprehensions between biology and political science. Biopolitics is characterized by both inheritance and overlapping, which, in terms of identity, open up the possibility of comprehending and describing ones own, i.e. belonging to one, as well as recognizing the adopted or the inherited. Biopolitics is questioning and analyzing resistance and practices of freedom and biopolitical theories are focusing on the concepts of care of the self. Such approach is closely related to self-representation of the post-totalitarian society, support to explain the concepts of domination, power, silencing of public opinion as the factors that determine the domination and control, and foster false consciousness and one-dimensional life. These processes are vividly demonstrated by the biopolitical concepts related to the identity representation of the totalitarian and post-totalitarian literature: victimization and self-involvement (self-colonization), the concept of the powerless or the infirm, commemoration. They will be excerpted and analyzed in the historical novel series WE. Latvia, the 20th Century, dwelling on the previous century in Latvia, each with a certain time line.
Publication Impact Profile
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 1
Publication details
References9
Foucault M., The birth of biopolotics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (lectures at the College de France), Picador, 2010.
Asmane A., Jaunais īgnums par memoriālo kultūru. Iejaukšanās, Rīga, Zinātne, 2018.
Ikstena N., Mātes piens, Rīga, Dienas Grāmata, 2015.
Bērziņš M., Svina garša, Latvija, Rīga, Dienas Grāmata, 2015.
Šuvajevs I., Bezvarīgie un biopolitika. Literatūras un filozofijas žurnāls PUNCTUM, https://www.punctummagazine.lv/2017/11/01/bezvarigie-unbiopolitika/ [accessed 31.07.2019.]
LSM lv. ziņu redakcija. Ikstena par romānu „Mātes piens”: Mēģināju saprast gan nošķirtības, gan būra situāciju, www.lsm.lv, 31.10.2015. [accessed 31.07.2019.]
Manfelde A., Virsnieku sievas, Rīga, Dienas Grāmata, 2017.
Henderson M. G., Breaking Frame (work)s: Popular Culture and Cultural Studies. Borders, Boundaries and Frames. Essays in Cultural Criticism and 25 Cultural Studies. [Ed. with an introduction by Mae G. Henderson], New York and London, Routledge, pp 3, 1995.
Schimanski J., Wolfe S. Entry Points: An Introduction. Border Poetics De-limited. [Eds. Johan Schimanski, Stephen Wolfe], TROLL, Band 9. Tromsøer Studien zur Kulturwissenschaft. Wehrhahn, Wehrhahn Verlag, pp 16, 2007.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
