Scholarly record
HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE IN DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore whether hermeneutical critique is a good method for describing, evaluating, and implementing deliberative democracy. The well-known philosophical direction is critical hermeneutics and key authors of this school of thought include Jürgen Habermas, Paul Ricoeur and Hans-Herbert Kögler. We want to inquire how they work with critical hermeneutics and we aim to show why it may be better to establish hermeneutical critique in the place of critical hermeneutics. One of our inquiring authors, Jürgen Habermas, is also one of the authors of deliberative democracy. Deliberative democracy is a kind of democracy that was invented in the USA in the 1980s, even though some look for its origin in ancient Greece, in the words of Pericles or in the work of Aristotle, as well as that of Edmund Burke, J. S. Mill, or Alexis de Tocqueville. We see some deliberative thoughts in the works of these older authors, but deliberative democracy as a modern democratical theory rose in the 1980s and 1990s. Joshua Cohen, John Dryzek, Robert Goodin, Seyla Benhabib and Robert Talisse represent contemporary deliberative theorists. Critical hermeneutics is an older Habermas theory. We will ask why we should revive this method when we know that theories of communicative action or discoursive ethics are newer ones. Some features of hermeneutical critique and of deliberative democracy can be seen in the works of Czech democratical theorists, especially in the work of T. G. Masaryk, Emanuel Rádl and in the human rights movement Charter 77. We think that deliberative democracy needs critical readers and critical participants and we assert that hermeneutical critique is a good method for them. Finally, we will research the various roles of critical hermeneutical practice for democratical citizens and deliberative theorists in the process of building a deliberative democracy.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References28
[1a] Habermas, J., Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp 1992, 667 p
[1b] Habermas, J., Three Normative Models of Democracy, in Benhabib, S., Democracy and Difference, Princeton University Press 1996, 21-30 p.
[2a] Heidegger, M., Sein und Zeit, English translation: Being and Time, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1978
[2b] Heidegger, M., Ontologie (Hermeneutik der Faktizität), GA 63, Frankfurt a. M. 1988
Gadamer, H.–G., Wahrheit und Methode, GW 1, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck 1990
[4a] Šimsa, M., The Question of Understanding and its Criteria in Conservative and Critical Hermeneutics, in Pokorný, Roskovec (eds.) Philosophical Hermeneutics and Biblical Exegesis, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck 2002, p. 59-67
[4b] Ricoeur, P., Hermeneutics and the Critique of Ideology, in Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press 1998, p. 63-100
[5a] Apel, K.-O., Transformation der Philosophie I - II. Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp 1993
[5b] Apel, K.-O., Diskurs und Verantwortung, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp 1992
[6a] Habermas, J., Theorie und Praxis, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp 1993
[6b] Habermas, J., Erkenntnis und Interesse, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp 1973
[6c] Habermas, J., Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp 1985
[6d] Habermas, J., Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns I-II, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp 1988
[7a] Ricoeur, P., Freud and Philosophy. An Essay on Interpretation, New Haven, Yale University Press 1970
[7b] Ricoeur, P., Lectures on Ideology and Utopia, New York, Columbia University Press 1986
Kögler, H.- H., The Power of Dialogue. Critical Hermeneutice after Gadamer and Foucault, Cambridge – London, MIT Press 1996
Yack, B., Rhetoric and Public Reasoning An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation, in Political Theory, Vol. 34, 4 / 2006, Sage Publications 2006, p. 417-438
Schumpeter, J., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, George Allen and Unwin Lrd, Routledge 1976
Masaryk, T. G., Světová revoluce [World revolution]. Prague, Čin 1925, p. 603 (English: The Making of a State, tr. H. W. Steed, London, 1927; tr. Howard Fertig, 1970.)
[12a] Rádl, E., Válka Čechů s Němci [The War between Czechs and Germen], Praha, Melantrich 1928
[12b] Rádl, E., Dějiny filosofie I-II Praha 1932
[12c] Rádl, E., O německé revoluci [On German Revolution], Praha 1933, 2002
[12d] Šimsa, M., The Role and Nature of Freedom in Two Normative Concepts of Democracy, in Human Affairs, 2/2010, Bratislava, SAV, pp. 114–123
Komárková, B., Původ a význam lidských práv, Praha, SPN 1990
[14a] Patočka, J., Češi I, Praha, Oikoymenh 2006.
[14b] In English: Kohák, E., Jan Patočka. Philosophy and Selected Writings, University of Chicago Press 1989
[14c] Havel, V., Keane, J., The Power of the Powerless: Citizens against the state in central-eastern Europe, Routledge 1985
Hejdánek, L., Dopisy příteli, Praha 1993. Deutsch: Wahrheit und Widerstand: Prager Briefe. München: P. Kirchheim, 1988
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
