SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

ENTREPRENEURIAL ECO-SYSTEMS AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS AN AGENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: CASE OF LATVIA

S. Polovko, G. Grinberga-Zalite, T. Korsaka, I. Prizevoite, Q. Ali Awan

First published: 2020https://doi.org/10.5593/sws.iscss.2020.7.1/s04.25View metrics

Abstract

The concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) has emerged in recent years as a framework to understand the nature of places in which entrepreneurial activity flourishes. Spigel (2017) defines entrepreneurial ecosystems as follows: В‘combinations of social, political, economic, and cultural elements within a region that support the development and growth of innovative start-ups and encourage nascent entrepreneurs and other actors to take the risks of starting, funding, and otherwise assisting high-risk ventures. In this regard, the areas that this paper wishes to address are; the degree to which existing entrepreneurial ecosystem in Latvia is prosocial; the role of existing dominant actors in the existing entrepreneurial eco-system in Latvia towards enabling pro-social entrepreneurship ventures; and the challenges that the existing NGOs and social enterprises are facing in their interaction with the larger eco-system. In this conceptual paper, theory and qualitative methods of data analysis, i-e interviews have been conducted to elaborate the findings. Scholars, entrepreneurs and public policy makers whom examine regional or national entrepreneurial ecosystems will have an insight towards the institution of a pro-social eco-system culture towards increased entrepreneurial activity with subsequent poverty alleviation, job creation and a larger regional development.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
ENTREPRENEURIAL ECO-SYSTEMS AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS AN AGENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: CASE OF LATVIA
Authors
S. Polovko, G. Grinberga-Zalite, T. Korsaka, I. Prizevoite, Q. Ali Awan
Proceedings
7th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences ISCSS 2020
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2020
Pages
209-216
SWS Citekey
Polovko20204209216
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7603-02-6
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Acs, Z., Desai, S., Klapper, L., What does entrepreneurship data really show? A comparison of the global entrepreneurship monitor and World Bank Group datasets. Small Business Economics 31, 2008, pp 219–239;

  2. Knight, F.H., 1921, Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston;

  3. Kirzner, Israel M., 1979, Perception, Opportunity and Profit, Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press;

  4. Shumpeter J.A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democrasy, 1942, Harper & Brothers, pp 431;

  5. Breznitz, D., & Taylor, M. The communal roots of entrepreneurial-technological growth-social fragmentation and stagnation: Reflection on Atlanta‘s technology cluster. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2014, 26(3/4), pp 375-396.

  6. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD. Paris;

  7. Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 2017, pp 887-903;

  8. Lepoutre, Jan & Justo, Rachida & Terjesen, Siri & Bosma, Niels. Designing a Global Standardized Methodology for Measuring Social Entrepreneurship Activity: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Social Entrepreneurship Study. Small Business Economics. 40. 2013, pp 693-714;

  9. Newbert, Scott & Hill, Ronald. Setting the Stage for Paradigm Development: A ‘Small-Tent’ Approach to Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 5. 2014, pp 243-269;

  10. Austin, James & Stevenson, Howard & Wei-Skillern, Jane. Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?. RAUSP : Revista de AdministraГ§ГЈo da

  11. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nauta, A. Self-interest and other-orientation inorganizational behavior: Implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, andpersonal initiative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 2009, pp 913–926;

  12. Douglas, Evan & Prentice, Catherine, "Innovation and profit motivations for socialentrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol.99(C), 2019, pages 69-79;

  13. Allen R. Bromberger, Perlman & Perlman L.L.P., Social enterprise: a lawyer’sperspective (2008), available at http://www.perlmanandperlman.com/publications/articles/2008/socialenterprise.pdf;

  14. Doeringer M. F., Note, Fostering Social Enterprise: A Historical and InternationalAnalysis, 20 DUKE J. COMP. & INT’L L. 291, 2010, pp 309;

  15. Social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe. Comparative synthesis report.Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list