Scholarly record
NATO ENLARGEMENT, FEARS AND REALITY
Abstract
The process of NATO enlargement received rather strong and exhausting criticism both in the academic and political sphere. However, only very few of the dire predictions about the negative impact of NATO enlargement have come true. No new dividing lines have been drawn in Europe. The new NATO members have always supported the NATO open door policy and have tried to help further NATO candidate states to get ready for the NATO enlargement. The deterioration of the NATO ability to provide collective defence has been caused by the focus on expeditionary operations and declining defence expenditures, not by the NATO enlargement. New NATO members have participated in many out of area operations and have provided a very significant contribution to the NATO effort. Political conflicts within NATO have been caused mainly by disputes between the “old” NATO members rather than by the qualitatively different character of the newcomers. Only very few of the dire predictions about the negative impact of NATO enlargement have come true and these negative impacts are mainly somehow connected to Russia. Paradoxically, the NATO-Russia relations worsened after the 2008 NATO summit in Bucharest when Ukraine and Georgia had not obtained the consent with the intensification of integration with NATO and the prospect of early accession, by which the entire process was postponed indefinitely.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
GLEBOV, Sergei. 2009. Concerning Strange Relations. Extensive Perceptions of Security Spaces Within the Ukraine-Russia-NATO triangle. Russian Politics & Law, Vol. 47, No. 5, 59.
PIECIUKIEWICZ, Tadeusz. 1996/1997. Security in Central and Eastern Europe: A View From Warsaw. Parametres, Vol. 26, No. 4, 129-130.
ASMUS, Ronald D. 2002. Opening NATO’s Door. How the Alliance Remade Itself for a New Era. New York: Columbia University Press, 20 – 29; 297.
DUIGNAN, Peter. 2000. NATO: Its Past, Present and Future. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 57.
WALTZ, Kenneth W. 2001. NATO’s Expansion: A Realist’s View. In: Rauchhaus, Robert W. (ed.): Explaining NATO Enlargement. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 23-38.
GADDIS, John Lewis. 1998. Now We Know. Rethinking Cold War History. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 28.
KYDD, Andrew. 2001. Trust Building, Trust Breaking: The Dilemma of NATO Enlargement. International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, Autumn, 801–828.
MEYER, Kent R. 2000/2001. US Support for Baltic Membership in NATO: What Ends, What Risks? Parameters, Vol. 30, No. 4, 67–82.
CARPENTER, Ted Galen. 1994. Beyond NATO. Staying Out of Europe’s Wars. Washington: CATO Institute, 45-69, 76-84.
KARABESHKIN, Leonid A. – SPECHLER, Dina R. 2007. EU and NATO Enlargement: Russia’s Expectations, Responses and Options for the Future. European Security, Vol. 16, No.3-4, 307-328.
RUPP, Richard E. 2002. NATO Enlargement: All Aboard? Destination Unknown. East European Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 3, 351.
KRAMER, Mark. 2009. The Myth of a No-NATO-Enlargement Pledge to Russia. The Washington Quarterly. Vol. 32, No. 2, 39-61.
KHUDOLEY, Konstantin – LANKO, Dmitri. 2004. Russia, NATO Enlargement and the Baltic States. Baltic Defence Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 125.
MAKARYCHEV, Andrey. 2009. Russia, NATO, and the Colour Revolutions. Discursive Traps. Russian Politics and Low, Vol. 47, No. 5, 45.
JACKSON, Bruce P. 2006. The „Soft War“ For Europe’s East. Policy Review, No. 137, 3–14.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
