SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

PERSONALITY, EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND COUPLE RELATIONSHIP - MEDIATORS FOR THE WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT

Andrei Tanasescu

First published: 2018https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018/3.2/S11.038View metrics

Abstract

Several studies approached the work-family relation in a positive manner, considering that performing multiple simultaneous roles is beneficial, determining the accumulation of benefits, the recovery of individual resources through compensation/buffering effects (in the case of a poor performance in one role), the enrichment of personality and the growth of self-esteem; still, most studies approach the work-family relation in terms of role conflict [1]. The main objective of this research was to analyse the predictor role of certain personality traits, emotional intelligence dimensions and aspects of the couple relationship for the work-family conflict. The subjects were 188 employed individuals, having a family or a long-time/stable relationship. The research method was the questionnaire-based survey, using the Work-Family Conflict Scale [2], the Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey [3], the Emotional Quotient inventory [4], and the Multidimensional Relationship Questionnaire [5]. The results showed positive but not statistically significant correlations between most of the predictor variables, and also strongly significant correlations (p<0,01) between the criterion variable (work-family conflict) and certain predictor variables such as general activity (r=-0.7), restraint (r=-0.52), ascendance (r=-0.43), sociability (r=-0.8), objectivity (r=-0.71), empathy (r=-0.64), optimism (r=-0.61), self-consciousness (r=-0.87), relational anxiety (r=0.61), relational assertiveness (r=-0.77), relational motivation (r=-0.84), relational satisfaction (r=-0.5). The R value of 0.786 proved the correlation between the predictor variables and the criterion one, and the value of R-squared (0.6177) indicated that 61,77% of the work-family conflict variation was determined by the predictor variables (as a whole) (F=2,571; p<0,01). In conclusion, certain personality traits (general activity, restraint, ascendance, sociability and objectivity), emotional intelligence dimensions (empathy, optimism and self-consciousness) and aspects of the couple relationship (relational anxiety, relational assertiveness, relational motivation and relational satisfaction) were predictors for the work-family conflict. These results can be used by various organisations in developing work-family conflict prevention programs. Although the results are statistically significant, the small number of subjects should lead to a cautious extrapolation, as this research is more of a pilot study.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
PERSONALITY, EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND COUPLE RELATIONSHIP - MEDIATORS FOR THE WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT
Authors
Andrei Tanasescu
Proceedings
5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2018
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2018
Pages
291-298
SWS Citekey
Tanasescu201811291298
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7408-54-6
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
ReferencesPending
Pendingreferences will be imported from Crossref/SWS source data

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list