Scholarly record
THE POSITION OF LEGAL CUSTOM IN ROMAN LAW
Abstract
The article offers an analysis of (legal) custom within Roman law and describes its different roles and functions. A customary law represents the oldest formal sources of law in human history. It was created by conduct of people who believed that they are obliged to follow rules created by repetitive continual action. It was dominant form of law in the archaic period of Roman law, but some of its remnants were persevered during whole existence of Roman Empire and beyond. The research is based on textual and historical analysis of both legal and extra-legal sources. The authors identified eight different roles of customs, namely: archaic customs (mos maiorum), custom as a tool for filling gaps in a written law, custom as the expression of popular sovereignty, administrative custom, custom as a source of provincial law, custom as a source of vulgar Roman law, custom as a kind-of international private law and finally customs which were not legally binding. Authors established with high degree of probability that customary law had a strong position in Roman law and acted in different contexts, roles and functional positions.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
Kaser, M. Mores maiorum und Gewohnheitsrecht. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte - Romanistische Abteilung, vol. 59, pp. 52-101, 1939.
Pernice, A. Zum römischen Gewohnheitsrechte. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte - Romanistische Abteilung, vol. 20, pp. 151-152, 1899.
Steiwenter, A. Mores. Wissowa, G., Kroll, W. (eds.). Paulys Real-Encyclpädie der classischen Altertumseissenschaft. Neue Bearbeitung. XVI. Band, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbucherhandlung, pp. 290-298, 1935.
Puchta, G. F. Das Gewohnheitsrecht. Ersten Teil. Erlangen: Palm, p. 85, 1928.
Kerneis, S. Consuetudo Legis: Writing Down Customs in the Roman Empire (2nd - 5th Century CE). Journal of the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, vol. 24, p. 248, 2016.
Skřejpek, M. Constitutio - mos - lex - codex (Flexibilní "ústava" starověkého Říma). Pocta Prof. JUDr. Václavu Pavlíčkovi, CSc. k 70. narozeninám. Praha: Linde, pp. 31- 43, 2004.
Kerneis, S. Loi et coutumes dans l’Empire romain. A propos du droit vulgaire. Hallebeek, J., Schermaier, M., Fiori, R., Coriat, J. P. (eds.). Inter cives nec non peregrinos. Essays in honour of Boudewijn Sirks, Göttingen: V&R Unipress, pp. 367- 384, 2014.
Bryen, A. Z. Judging Empire. Courts and Culture in Rome´s Eastern Provincies. Law and History Review, vol. 30, p. 786, 2012.
Arangio-Ruiz, V. Istituzioni di diritto romano. vol. 14, Napoli: Jovene, p. 6, 1960.
Riccobono, S. et all. Fontes iuris romani antejustiniani. Pars prima. Firenze: Barbèra, (II. 18-22), p 137, 1968.
Schiller, A. A. Roman Law: Mechanism of Development. Hague & Paris & New York: Mouton, p. 259, 1978.
Grenfell, B. P., Hunt, A. S. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 2, London: Egypt Exploration Fund, (CCXXXVII - Petition of Dionysia), pp. 141-180, 1899.
Mlkvý, M. K niektorým metodologickým aspektom skúmania recepcie rímskeho práva. 3. česko-slovenské právněhistorické setkání doktorandů a postdoktorandů. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 182-194, 2015.
Brtko, R., Čunderlík Čerbová, V., Nemec, M. Prirodzené právo – jeho vývoj a prvky v rímskom a v kánonickom práve. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Právnická fakulta, pp. 7-33, 2014.
Kasinec, R. Legal pluralism and sources of law today. Hodnotový základ práva. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Právnická fakulta, pp. 215-219, 2011.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
