SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

DETERMINANTS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY FORMS

Yu. A. Shashlova, I. V. Zhitnikov, I. A. Gerasimova

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCSS.2019.2/S04.011View metrics

Abstract

We identified factors that influence the ability and desire of people to engage in physical culture. We studied their impact on the classes of various physical activity forms. We used the data of The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey-Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE), 25th wave (2016). The sample size is 1893. There are several Russian and foreign papers about determinants of physical activity. We used it to highlight the necessary factors. We used the multinomial regression for modeling. It helped us to find the difference between determinants influence on existing physical activity forms. We found that various sets of characteristics affect physical activity of different intensity, duration and severity. Light physical exercises for recreation less than three times a week are influenced by age, economic sphere, income, subjective material well-being assessment, body mass index and smoking. Exercises of medium or high severity less than three times a week are influenced by age, settlement type, economic sphere, income and subjective material well-being assessment. High-activity physical exercises at least three times a week for 15 minutes or more depend on settlement type, economic sphere, income and body mass index. Daily physical exercises for at least 30 minutes per day are influenced by age, settlement type, education level, and subjective material well-being assessment. Daily physical activity less than 30 minutes per day depends on education level, subjective material well-being assessment and smoking. Thus, the factors influence on different physical activity forms varies significantly. The multinomial regression usage allows us to understand who prefers particular forms of physical activity. So, the multinomial regression tools give a chance to provide a more in-depth study of the population preferences in the physical culture field. The government can use the research results in the state policy development and adjustment in the physical culture and sports field.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
DETERMINANTS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY FORMS
Authors
Yu. A. Shashlova, I. V. Zhitnikov, I. A. Gerasimova
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences ISCSS 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
81-88
SWS Citekey
Shashlova201948188
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7408-92-8
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References8
  1. Burton L.C., Shapiro S., German P.S.: Determinants of physical activity initiation and maintenance among community-dwelling older persons. Prev Med 1999. 29:422-430.

  2. Hirvensalo M., Lintunen T., Rantanen T.: The continuity of physical activity–a retrospective and prospective study among older people. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000. 10:37-41.

  3. Jancey J., Lee A., Howat P., Clarke A., Wang K., Shilton T.: Reducing attrition in physical activity programs for older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2007. 15:152-165.

  4. Costanzo C., Walker S.N.: Incorporating self-efficacy and interpersonal support in an intervention to increase physical activity in older women. Women Health 2008. 47:91-108.

  5. Zasimova Liudmila, Loktev Daniil: Sports for the Rich? (Empirical Investigation of Participation in Sport in Russia). HSE Economic Journal, 2016, vol. 20, № 3, pp. 471–499.

  6. Garcia A.W., King A.C.: Predicting Long-term Adherence to Aerobic Exercise: A Comparison of Two Models. J Sport Exercise Psy 1991. 13:394-410.

  7. Emery C.F., Hauck E.R., Blumenthal J.A.: Exercise adherence or maintenance among older adults: 1-year follow-up study. Psychol Aging 1992. 7:466-470.

  8. King A.C., Kiernan M., Oman R.F., Kraemer H.C., Hull M., Ahn D.: Can we identify who will adhere to long-term physical activity? Signal detection methodology as a potential aid to clinical decision making. Health Psychol 1997. 16:380-389.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list