Scholarly record
RENAISSANCE PERSPECTIVE, CARTOGRAPHY, AND THE BIRTH OF MODERN POLITICS
Abstract
The relationship between the emergence of linear perspective during the Renaissance and scientific cartography is well known. They both inaugurated and exhibited a new relationship to the world a de-theologised world, which the human being was now able to measure and circumscribe. Linear perspective and cartography both enabled to frame the world in a window which we could from then onwards encompass, think, visualise, and view at a glance. Framing became the key operation of Renaissance art and science. The constructivism of the modern spatial mind is hence not simply about tracing lines and figures on a gridable space: It is about delineating precise objects and shapes, and framing them. My contention is that the newfound concept of space which undergirds linear perspective and cartography, a space which could be divided, framed and organised, paved the way for the conceptual changes which occurred in political theory in the 17th century. In particular, they allowed for the theorisation of the nation-state, the essence of which is the territory. The territory reflects the same operation of framing, and of enclosing human action and activity, as do perspectival painting and cartography. Politics became spatial. I will, in particular, take a look at the crucial nexus between cartography and the territorial state: Maps did not aim to be mere copies or images of their object, but they enabled and created it, in a way. There is little doubt that the spatial essence of the nation-state is largely owed to its newfound visualisation on a map: The territory could now be represented as a totality under the overlooking gaze of the ruler, who imitated God perusing over his dominion. Cartography was enormously instrumental in reifying and divinising modern political power, as well as in creating, and incidentally controlling, the representations of the national space. This will lead me to investigate how Renaissance perspective and cartography played a pivotal role in transitioning from one meaning of representation to another. Michel Foucault famously stated that with the advent of the classical age in the 17th century, the concept of representation shifted from an iconic to a semiotic understanding from the image, it became a sign. My contention is that the Renaissance twin invention of perspective and scientific cartography helped usher the era of representation of representation, as it also explains the growing conundrum of political representation.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
Max Jammer, Concepts of Space, 3 rd ed., Dover, New York, 1993.
Erwin Panofsky, Perspective as Symbolic Form, Urzone, New York, 1991.
Leon Battista Alberti, On the Art of Building, transl. J. Rykwert, N. Leach, R. Tavernor, MIT press, Cambridge, 1988.
Ken Hillis, “The Power of Disembodied Imagination: Perspective’s Role in Cartography”, Cartographica, 31/3, Toronto, 1994. pp. 1-17.
Jeppe Strandsbjerg, “The Cartographic Production of Territorial Space: Mapping and State Formation in Early Modern Denmark”, Geopolitics, 13, London, 2008, pp. 335-358.
Camille Serchuk, “Picturing France in the Fifteenth Century: The Map in BNF Ms Fr. 4991”, Imago Mundi, 58/2, London, 2006, pp. 133-149.
Jacques Revel, “Knowledge of the Territory”, in Science in Context, 4/1, Cambridge, 1991, pp. 133-162.
Bruno Latour, “Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together”, in H. Kuklick (ed.), Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, Jai Press vol. 6, New York, 1986, pp. 1-40.
Thongchai Winichakul, Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 1994.
Jean Baudrillard, Simulations, transl. Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman, Semiotext, New York, 1983.
J.B. Harley, “Rereading the Maps of the Columbian Encounter”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82/3, New York, 1992, pp. 522-542.
Mark Neoclous, “Off the Map: On Violence and Cartography”, European journal of Social Theory, 6/4, London, 2003, pp. 409-425.
Michel Foucault, The Order of Things, London, Routledge, 2005.
Louis Marin, Le Portrait du Roi, Paris, Ed. de Minuit, 1981.
Gerhard Göhler, “La dimension affective de la démocratie – Réflexions sur la relation de la déliberation et de la symbolicité”, in Raisons Politiques, 50/2, Paris, 2013, pp. 97-114.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
