SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

VOCATIONAL TEACHERS' STANDPOINTS ON EDUCATIONAL INTERACTION

R. Miciuliene, N. Ciuciulkiene

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCSS.2019.4/S13.087View metrics

Abstract

It is assumed that the content of the broad concept of educational interaction consists of many related components and competences that determine the quality of vocational education and training. In order to understand the educational interaction, the vocational teachers' experience in communicating with modern students, their behaviors and insights better, the qualitative research was conducted. The research design was based on five group interviews with 48 vocational teachers from vocational education and training institutions in Lithuania. While selecting research participants for interviews the authors of the research paper tried to include a wide range of teaching experiences (different positions in the school, qualification categories, subjects, age, work experience, etc.). The data were collected using a semi-structured interview questionnaire. The axial data coding that distinguished the educational interaction phenomenon as research result – preparation of a skilled worker for the labor market was applied. The premises for this interaction, contexts, and operational strategies used, context-related factors and the consequences of the interaction have been distinguished.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.
PLUMX see details

Publication details

Title
VOCATIONAL TEACHERS' STANDPOINTS ON EDUCATIONAL INTERACTION
Authors
R. Miciuliene, N. Ciuciulkiene
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences ISCSS 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
677-684
SWS Citekey
Miciuliene201913677684
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7408-94-2
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
vocational teacherseducational interactionaxial codingaxial coding.
References8

  1. Anderson, T., Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 4.2, 2003.

  2. Bouchard, R., Mangenot, M., InteractivitГ©, interactions et multimГ©dia. Vol. 5. ENS Editions, 2001.

  3. Cazden, C., B., Communicative competence, classroom interaction, and educational equity: The selected works of Courtney B. Cazden. Routledge, 2017.

  4. Corbin, J., Strauss, A., Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 378 p., 2008.

  5. Gettliffe-Grant, N., Analyse de MГ©diation, mГ©diatisation et apprentissages. Alsic. Apprentissage des Langues et SystГЁmes d'Information et de Communication 7, 2004.

  6. Glaser, B. G., Holton, J., Remodeling Grounded Theory, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 5(2), Article 4, 2004.

  7. Littleton, K., Howe, C., eds. Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction, Routledge, 2010.

  8. Markee, N., The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction, John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list