Scholarly record
THE IMPACT OF INTEGRATION ON SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INEQUALITY OF REGIONS
Abstract
Integration is always effect positive on the economy of the country: due to increase of competition between firms, growth of production's volume, more effective territorial distribution of economic activity, reducing the cost of resources and the cost of goods to the value of the border's costs. Domestically, the more successful regions receive more benefits from the integration that enhances the existing socio-economic inequality among the regions. The aim of the study is to identify and evaluate the effect of integra-tion factors on regional inequality, building an econometric model of such a relationship and test a model in the Russian regions. The research is supported by the grant of the President of Russian Federation, project No. 1107.2014.6
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
1. Devlin, R., & Davis, R. (1998). Towards an evaluation of regional integration in Latin America in the 1990s. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean, 44 p.
2. Bruno M. (1988). Opening-up: Liberalization with stabilization. In The Open economy: Tools for policymakers in developing countries. Dornbusch, R. New York: Published for the World Bank, Oxford University Press. P. 223-248
3. Dixon, P. (1982). ORANI, a multisectoral model of the Australian economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. 372 p.
4. Gibb, R. (1996). Towards a new southern Africa: The challenge of regional economic co‐operation and integration. South African Journal of International Affairs, 4(1), 1-26.
5. Bjorvatn, K. (1999). Third World regional integration. European Economic Review, 43(1), 47-64
6. Beenstock, M., & Felsenstein, D. (2010). Marshallian theory of regional agglomeration. Papers in Regional Science, 89(1), 155-172.
7. Novotny J. (2004). Decomposition of global and European socio-economic inequalities with attention to their regional dimensions. RSES. 4 (2). 45-64
8. Easterly, W-R. (2004) Globalization, Inequality, and Development: The Big Picture/ Monetary and Economic Studies, 22 (1), 57–87
9. Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615-1660
10. Aghion, P. (2002). Schumpeterian Growth Theory and the Dynamics of Income Inequality. Econometrica, 70 (3), 855-882
11. Ravenhill, J. (2006) Globalization, Poverty and Inequality. New Political Economy. 11 (4), 583-587
12. Basu, K. (2006). Globalization, poverty, and inequality: What is the relationship? What can be done? World Development, 34(8), 1361-1373
13. Bowles S., Gintis H. (2002). The Inheritance of Inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 16 (3).pp. 3-30
14. Rastvortseva, S. (2014). Assessment Of The Regional Economic Potential For The Industrial Clusters Development. SGEM 2014 Scientific SubConference on POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, 3, 75-82. DOI: 10.5593/sgemsocial2014/B23/S7.009
15. Rastvortseva S., Usmanov D. (2015) Estimation of globalization impact on social and economical development of Russian regions. Belgorod: Konstanta, 260 p.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.



