SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND AUTONOMY OF WOMEN

T. Pilishvili, A. Danilova, T. Yamaltdinova

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCSS.2019.3/S11.039View metrics

Abstract

Responding to the call of the times, women around the world are becoming more and more self-sufficient when it comes to matters of financial security and making key life-changing decisions. Therefore, it becomes important to study the influence this trend has on the populationВ’s well-being, and also to study what factors of this matter are pertinent to the well-being of women. Studies from across the world give reason to believe that, despite the fact that a number of studies confirm a positive correlation between autonomy, self-efficacy and SWB (social well-being), their correlation is influenced greatly by the local social and cultural norms, to the point of inverting their relation in some cases. Among other significant influencing factors are the individual differences of female participants. For example, openness to new experiences can determine their behavioral strategies pertaining to accepting gender norms that are connected to increased levels of self-efficacy and SWB. As a result, it is prudent to keep in mind that maintaining high SWB levels in the process of social, economic, and political integration of women requires a careful consideration of all the relevant factors. Our understanding of both the number of those factors and their properties are, at this time, insufficient, which calls for further research and analysis.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND AUTONOMY OF WOMEN
Authors
T. Pilishvili, A. Danilova, T. Yamaltdinova
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences ISCSS 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
303-310
SWS Citekey
Pilishvili201911303310
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7408-93-5
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References14
  1. Bourassa, K. J., Sbarra, D. A., & Whisman, M. A. Women in very low quality marriages gain life satisfaction following divorce. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(3), 490–499, 2015.

  2. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), art. 15, 2018.

  3. Hajdu, G., & Hajdu, T. Intra-couple income distribution and subjective well-being: The moderating effect of gender norms. European Sociological Review, 2018, 1–19.

  4. Hoop, T., Kempen, L., & Linssen, R. Women's autonomy and subjective well-being: How gender norms shape the impact of self-help groups in Odisha, India. Feminist Economics, 20(3), 103–135, 2014.

  5. Meer, P. H. Gender, unemployment and subjective well-being: Why being unemployed is worse for men than for women. Social Indicators Research, 115(1), 23–44, 2014.

  6. Piña-Watson, B., Jimenez, N., & Ojeda, L. Self-construal, career decision self-efficacy, and perceived barriers predict Mexican American women’s life satisfaction. Career Development Quarterly, 62(3), 210–223, 2014.

  7. Roeters, A., & Craig, L. Part-time work, women’s work–life conflict, and job satisfaction: A cross-national comparison of Australia, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 55(3), 185–203, 2014.

  8. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65, 14–23, 1996.

  9. Salehi, A., Harris, H., Coyne, E., & Sebar, B. Perceived control and self-efficacy, subjective well-being and lifestyle behaviours in young Iranian women. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(7), 1415–1425, 2016.

  10. Seva, I. J., Vinberg, S., Nordenmark, M., & Strandh, M. Subjective well-being among the self-employed in Europe: Macroeconomy, gender and immigrant status. Small Business Economics, 46(2), 48–61, 2016.

  11. York, R., & Bell, S. E. Life satisfaction across nations: The effects of women’s political status and public priorities. Social Science Research, 48, 48–61, 2014.

  12. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070, 1988.

  13. Weiss, D., Freund, A. M., & Weiss, B. S. Mastering developmental transitions in young and middle adulthood: The interplay of openness to experience and traditional gender ideology on women’s self-efficacy and subjective well-being. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 79–79, 2013.

  14. Yakushko, O., Jimenez, N., & Ojeda, L. Do feminist women feel better about their lives? Examining patterns of feminist identity development and women’s subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 57(3–4), 223–234

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list