SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

AGGRESSOR’S BEHAVIOR TERRORISM DETERMINANTS WITHIN NEW WARS

Viktoriia Puhach, Tetiana Kostiuk

First published: 2022https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2022/s01.001View metrics

Abstract

The history of mankind demonstrates that the most difficult task has always been and remains the maintenance of society and social life in an orderly, balanced and dynamic state of optimal viability. The depressing regularity of social cataclysms, wars, crises and local conflicts convincingly testifies to the extreme complexity of this task. This complexity, however, does not negate the need and importance of scientific support for specific modern forms of violence and the development of new theoretical and empirical approaches to their research. The purpose of this article is to enrich, and, perhaps, even deepen, the modern understanding of the of «new wars» by means of detailed characterization of the aggressor's behavioral aberration within the analytical optics developed on the basis of such cruel and violent actions as terrorism. The methodology of the given study bases on the principle of historicism allowing to consider the war in its development in space and time. Using the method of situational analysis at the example of Russian aggression against Ukraine, this study managed to avoid the gap between theory and practice. As well the article contains a researchanalytic review of the body of scientific literature, aimed at outlining the paradigmatic framework for conceptualizing the phenomenon of «new wars». While conducting the research it was found that the behavior of the aggressor in the conditions of the new war has a clearly expressed terrorism determinism, which qualitatively transforms the nature and methods of war. Within the analysis of the changing the war process format which is now based on the logic of terrorism, the study’s main emphasis is placed on two forms of terrorism - state terrorism and information terrorism. Reconstructing the course of the Russian-Ukrainian war in 2022, it was found that the attribute characteristic of this war is the combination of two aforementioned forms of terrorism. This article contains topics and provisions that may cause discussion. Nevertheless, it allows to go beyond the traditional discourse of security, provoking the exit of scientific research to a qualitatively new level of theoretical reflection of the modern security challenges emanation.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2

Publication details

Title
AGGRESSOR’S BEHAVIOR TERRORISM DETERMINANTS WITHIN NEW WARS
Authors
Viktoriia Puhach, Tetiana Kostiuk
Proceedings
Proceedings of 9th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2022
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2022
Pages
3-10
SWS Citekey
Puhach20221310
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-04-0
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References12
  1. Voyakovsky D. (2012). Mental borders in Europe without borders. Kyiv. 320 p.

  2. Kaldor M. (2013). In Defense of New Wars, Stability. International Journal of Security & Development, vol. 2/issue 1, pp. 1-16.

  3. Mamandi M. (2002). Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: A Political Perspective on Culture and Terrorism. American Anthropologist, vol. 104, pp. 766-775.

  4. Hoffman B. (2006). Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press, New York. 432 p.

  5. Open appeal to the international community of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 10.08.2022. URL : https://www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Messages/news/Pages/View.aspx?MessageID=9359

  6. Blakeley R. (2012). State violence as State terrorism. The Ashgate Research Companion to Political Violence. Edited by M. Breen-Smyth. London. pp 63-78;

  7. Murphy E., Tamana A. (2010). State terrorism and the military in Pakistan. Contemporary State Terrorism: Theory and practice, edited by R. Jackson, E. Murphy and S. Poynting. Routledge, London and New York. pp. 48-67;

  8. Arthashastra or the science of politics, publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Moscow, Leningrad, 1959. 786 p.

  9. Dzolo D. (2010). Democracy and complexity: a realistic approach. Moscow. 320 p.

  10. Puhach V., Ishchenko O. (2020). Information terrorism: interpretive and attributive analysis of the phenomenon. PNAP: Scientific Journal of Polonia University, vol. 39/No. 2. pp. 284-292.

  11. Rosyjska propaganda falszuje first page of Dziennika Wschodniego. A jaka jest prawda?, Dzinnik Wschodni, 27 lipca, 2022. URL : https://www.dziennikwschodni.pl/lublin/rosyjska-propaganda-falszuje-pierwsza-stronedziennika-wschodniego-a-jak-wygladaprawda,n,1000311554.html?fbclid=IwAR3s8LYrw7bjrE3ZpKIx0IFA6aN0JMMupTKZNMgx01PMuWR8Cd-LK7woI8

  12. Snyder T. (2017). On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. Tim Duggan Books, New York. 76 p.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list