SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

HOW MANY CHANGES ARE TOO MANY? ELECTORAL REFORMS IN ROMANIA BETWEEN 1990 AND 2015: THE CAROUSEL NEVER STOPS TURNING

M. Ivanescu

First published: 2015https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2015/b21/s4.020View metrics

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to analyse the electoral reforms that have been performed in Romania in the last 25 years, in order to identify their effects, which have been, in some cases, harmful to the already difficult process of transition to democracy. We base our working hypothesis on the assumption that the large number of these reforms, as well as, in some cases, their ambiguity and/or complexity, represented important criteria which led to a constant decrease in the population's voting participation and in the diminished trust Romanians have in the political class. Although the most drastic changes occurred with the new electoral law from 2008, with major effects on both the manner of electing representatives and the manner of translating votes into parliamentary seats, many of the electoral laws from before also produced negative effects regarding the electoral disproportionality. Between 1992 and 2004, the electoral system was one of proportional representation, but it produced some very strong majoritarian effects. This is what political scientist Cristian Preda called the „perverse effect” of the Romanian electoral system. It is noteworthy in this regard that in the 2000 – 2004 timeframe, the Romanian political class discussed the need to reform the electoral system removing the proportional representation and replacing it with a single-member majority voting system. The main motivation for this proposal was that the system of proportional representation generated Parliament fragmentation and by using closed lists candidates that were not accepted by the central organizations of the parties could not run for office. The new electoral law, from 2008, brought the most changes and produced some of the most serious debates, not only within the political class, but also – and especially – within civil society and determined, among others, the increased rate of absenteeism in the parliamentary elections of 2008 and 2012. Besides other factors, the complexity and sometimes the contradictions of the Romanian electoral laws have determined the population to disbelief the possibility of a real change and to take refuge in absenteeism, as a way of protest over the negative effects of the many electoral reforms that they have undertaken in the last 25 years.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
HOW MANY CHANGES ARE TOO MANY? ELECTORAL REFORMS IN ROMANIA BETWEEN 1990 AND 2015: THE CAROUSEL NEVER STOPS TURNING
Authors
M. Ivanescu
Proceedings
2nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2015, Book 2
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2015
Pages
Not available yet
SWS Citekey
IVANESCU2015
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7105-46-9
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References15
  1. „The Decree – Law no. 92 of March 14th 1990 for the election of the Parliament and of the President of Romania”, published in the “Official Journal of Romania” no. 35 of March 18th, 1990.

  2. Cristian Preda, Rumânii fericiţi. Vot şi putere de la 1831 până în prezent, Polirom, Iaşi, p. 294, 2011.

  3. „Law no. 68/1992 for the election of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate”, promulgated by Decree no. 145 of July 13th 1992 and published in the „Official Journal of Romania” no. 164 of July 16th 1992.

  4. Mihaela Ivănescu, „Romanian Electoral Laws between 1990 and 2012: Reforms and Evolutions, or Absenteeism Generating Instability?”, in Annals of the „Ovidius” University of Constanta – Political Science Series, nr. 2, pp. 159-173, 2013.

  5. George VOICU, Pluripartidismul. O teorie a democraţiei, All, Bucureşti, p. 223, 1998.

  6. „O.U.G. no. 129 of June 30th 2000, for amending and supplementing Law no. 68/1992 and Law no. 69/1992”, published in the “Official Journal of Romania” no. 311 of July 5th 2000.

  7. Cristian Preda, Partide şi alegeri în România postcomunistă: 1989-2004, Nemira, Bucureşti, pp. 26-27, 2005.

  8. Daniel Barbu, Republica absentă. Politică şi societate în România postcomunistă, Nemira, Bucureşti, pp. 163-180, 1999.

  9. Cristian Preda, Sorina Soare, Regimul, partidele şi sistemul politic din România, Nemira, București, pp. 101-102, 2009.

  10. Giovanni Sartori, Ingineria constituţională comparată. Structuri, stimulente şi rezultate, Institutul European, Iaşi, p. 112, 2008.

  11. The data was published by the Romanian Permanent Electoral Authority, available at: http://www.roaep.ro/ro/section.php?id=67&l2=140&l3=0&ids=7 (official website of the Romanian Permanent Electoral Authority).

  12. „Law no. 35 from March 13th 2008 for the election of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate”, published in the “Official Journal of Romania” no. 196 from March 13th , 2008.

  13. William M. Downs, „The 2008 Parliamentary Elections in Romania”, in Electoral Studies, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 510-513, 2009.

  14. Alexandru Radu, „Reformă sau experiment electoral”, in Sfera politicii, nr. 131- 132, p. 16, 2009, p. 16.

  15. Cosmin Gabriel Marian, Ronald F. King, „Plus ça change: Electoral Law Reform and the 2008 Romanian Parliamentary Elections”, in Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 7-18, 2010.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The SSA Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

SWS Social Sciences and Arts conference
SWS Social Sciences & Arts

Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities

The joint SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities, bringing together research in society, culture, education, law, economics, humanities and the arts.

Visit sgemsocial.org
SWS Vienna When Science Meets Art
SWS Vienna - When Science Meets Art

Social Sciences, Science Meets Art

The Vienna platform for Social Sciences, interdisciplinary research and the dialogue between science, art, society and culture.

Visit sgemvienna.org
SWS Italy The Renaissance Reimagined
SWS Italy - The Renaissance Reimagined

Arts and Humanities, Renaissance Studies

The SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Arts and Humanities in Italy, Florence and Bologna, focused on culture, history, heritage, literature, philosophy, art and humanistic research.

Visit sgemitaly.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications