SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

IMPORTANCE OF ADEQUATE SCREENING TOOLS FOR PRESCHOOLERS: TESTING ASQ-3 ON CROATIAN POPULATION

M. Miocic, T. Velki, K. Romstein

First published: 2020https://doi.org/10.5593/sws.iscss.v2020.7.2/s05.05View metrics

Abstract

It is estimated that around 15% of children aged 3 to 17 have some sort of developmental disabilities, while less than 50% of children with disabilities are recognized by paediatricians before entering the primary school. Screening plays a significant role in the recognition of those children, providing the ground for early intervention and support for families. Ages and stages-3 Questionnaire (ASQ-3), as the most used screening tool for children aged 2 months to 66 months, was recently translated in the Croatian language. The aim of this study was to check ASQ-3 sensitivity for a different aspect of development delays in the population of Croatian preschool children. Mothers filled out ASQ-3 and gave anamnestic data for their children (N=63, boys 71.4% and girls 28.6%). The average age of children was M=46.34 months. Children were split into three groups: children with a normal developmental pattern, i.e. without disabilities (n=13), with autism spectrum disorder (n=28) and with multiple disabilities (n=22). Chi-Square was used to test the number of children with the normal development against number of children with delays for each group of children at five different development areas according to ASQ-3 (communication, fine motor, gross motor, problem-solving, personal-social area). For children with normal developmental pattern, there was more of them with developmental delays than expected in all developmental areas (communication, gross motor, problem-solving, personal-social) except fine motor skills. About 40% - 70% of children had delays in contrast to 15% which is expected in general population. For children with autism spectrum disorders ASQ-3 has shown poor sensitivity (could not discriminate children with autism from the general population). For children with multiple disabilities ASQ-3 proven to be a good screening test on all measured developmental areas. Two important points can be argued: first, Croatian translations of ASQ-3 showed good sensitivity as a screening tool for multiple disorders; second, practitioners, especially preschool teachers and paediatricians could use this screening tool more often in order to direct families in early intervention.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
IMPORTANCE OF ADEQUATE SCREENING TOOLS FOR PRESCHOOLERS: TESTING ASQ-3 ON CROATIAN POPULATION
Authors
M. Miocic, T. Velki, K. Romstein
Proceedings
7th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2020
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2020
Pages
41-48
SWS Citekey
Miocic202054148
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7603-15-6
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Glascoe, F.P., Sanders, H., Value of parents’ estimates of children’s developmental ages, Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 127/issue 5, pp 831-835, 1995.

  2. Ventola, P., Kleinman, J., Pandey, J., Wilson, L., Esser, E., Boorstein, H., Dumont-Mathieu, T., Marshia, G., Barton, M., Hodgson, S., Green, J., Volkmar, F., Chawarska, K., Babitz, T., Robins, D., Fein, D., Differentiating between autism spectrum disorders and other developmental disabilities in children who failed a screening instrument for ASD, Journal of Austism Spectrum Disorders, vol. 37/issue 3, pp 425-436, 2007.

  3. McIntosh, D.E., Gibney, L., Quinn, K., Kundert, D., Concurrent validity of the early screening profiles and the differential ability scales with an at-risk preschool sample, Psychology in the School, vol. 37/issue 3, pp 201-207, 2000.

  4. Sices, L., Stancin, T., Kirchner, H.L., Bauchner, H., PEDS and ASQ developmental screening tests may not identify the same children, Pediatrics, vol. 124/issue 4, pp e640–e647, 2009.

  5. Glascoe, F.P., Screening for Developmental and Behavioral Problems, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Review, vol. 113, pp 173-179, 2005.

  6. Squires, J., Twombly, E., Bricker, D., Potter. L., Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Third Edition, Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, 2009.

  7. King-Dowling, S., Rodrigez, M.C., Missiuna, C., Cairney, J., Validity of the ASQ-3 to detect risk of Developmental Coordination Disorder in preschoolers, Child: care, health and development, vol. 42/issue 2, pp 188-194, 2015.

  8. Troude, P., Squires, J., L'HГ©lias, L.F., Bouyer, J., de La Rochebrochard, E., Ages and Stages Questionnaires: feasibility of postal surveys for child follow-up. Early Human development, vol. 87/issue 10, pp 671-676, 2011.

  9. McCrae, J., Cahalane, H., Fusco, R.A., Direction for developmental screening in child welfare based on ASQ-3, Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 33/issue 8, pp 1412-1418, 2011.

  10. Boyle, C.A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L.A., Cohen, R.A., Blumberg, S.J., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., Visser, S., Kogan, M.D., Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008, Pediatrics, vol. 127/issue 6, p

  11. Zablotsky, B., Black, L.I., Maenner, M.J., Schieve, L.A., Danielson, M.L., Bitsko, R.H., Blumberg, S.J., Kogan, M.D., Boyle, C.A., Prevalence and Trends of Developmental Disabilities among Children in the US: 2009–2017, Pediatrics, vol. 144/issue 4, pp e20190811, 2019.

  12. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, VA: American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, 2013.

  13. Arabameri, E., Sotoodeh, M.S., Early developmental delay in children with autism: A study from a developing country, Infant Behavior and Development, vol. 39, pp 118-123, 2015.

  14. World Health Organization, International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease, Geneva, 1980.

  15. Batshaw, M.L., Roizen, N.J., Lotrecchiano, G.R., Children with disabilities: Seventh edition, Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, 2013.p 1034–1042, 2011.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list