SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

DYING TO BUY HIGH STATUS BRANDS: BANNER ADS DESIGNED WITH REMINDERS OF DEATH INFLUENCE BRAND CHOICE IN ONLINE SHOPPING DESPITE BANNER BLINDNESS

Rene Holl

First published: 2025https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2025/s03.35View metrics

Abstract

Terror Management Theory (TMT) research demonstrates that exposure to mortality salient (MS) content—reminders of death—can influence consumers to prefer high-status brands and effects of MS occur even when MS content is only peripherally present. Peripheral information in Web shopping may have a similar effect: people exposed to MS banner ads should choose high-status brands more often than people who are exposed to non-MS banner ads, especially when they are "banner blind" (i.e., when they do not consciously register the ads). Participants shopped for a single product within each of four product categories (T-shirts, watches, chocolates and automobiles) on a fictitious e-commerce site in both a pilot study, where participants completed MS or non-MS writing tasks before shopping, and in a main study, where participants shopped on webpages that displayed MS or non-MS banner ads. In both studies, they then ranked each product by status; in the main study, they indicated if they recalled seeing any of the banner ads shown during shopping in a banner ads recognition task, to detect banner blindness. The result from the pilot study supported the MS hypothesis. In the main study, MS banner ads marginally increased the likelihood of selecting high-status automobiles. Among the 136 “banner blind” participants—but not the 59 participants who recognized at least one banner ad—MS banner ads significantly increased shoppers' likelihood of selecting higher-status items. A framework for evaluating ethical versus unethical advertising was reviewed to determine that it is unethical for advertisers who are tempted to intentionally use MS stimuli in online advertising to influence consumer behavior. This study aims to not only find evidence to support the hypothesized effect, but to also bring us one step closer to determining if such a subtle peripheral effect might already influence people’s decision-making processes, and sway their purchase decisions, in their day-to-day experiences. Ideally, these findings can serve to make consumers aware of the peripheral subliminal MS effect that may bias their decision-making and educate them to be vigilant for circumstances when this MS effect may occur.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
DYING TO BUY HIGH STATUS BRANDS: BANNER ADS DESIGNED WITH REMINDERS OF DEATH INFLUENCE BRAND CHOICE IN ONLINE SHOPPING DESPITE BANNER BLINDNESS
Authors
Rene Holl
Proceedings
Proceedings of 12th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2025
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2025
Pages
295-310
SWS Citekey
Holl20257295310
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-16-3
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References20
  1. Ad unit guidelines (2017). Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://iabtechlab. com/standards/iab-new-ad-portfolio-guidelines/

  2. Arndt, J., Cook, A., & Routledge, C. (2004). The blueprint of terror management. In Greenberg, J., & Koole, S. L. (Eds.). Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 37). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

  3. Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1997). Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview. Psychological Science, 8, 379–385.

  4. Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999) Toward an Ethics of Persuasive Technology. Communications of the ACM, 42 (5), 51-58.

  5. Benway, J., & Lane, D. (1998). Banner blindness: Web searchers often miss "obvious" links. Internetworking: ITG Newsletter, 1 (3). Retrieved from http://www. internettg.org/newsletter/dec98/banner_blindness.html

  6. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189 (194), 4-7.

  7. Ferraro, R., Shiv, B., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die: Effects of mortality salience and self-esteem on self-regulation in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (1), 65-75.

  8. Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers

  9. Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Rosenblatt, A., Burling, J., Lyon, D., & Pinel, E. (1992). Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63 (6), 9

  10. Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). The Scrooge effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1342-1353.

  11. King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., & Abdelkhalik, J. (2009). Death, life, scarcity, and value: An alternative perspective on the meaning of death. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1459-1462.

  12. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  13. Mandel, N., & Heine, S. J. (1999). Terror management and marketing: He who dies with the most toys wins. In E. Arnold & L. Scott (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 527-532). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

  14. Mandel, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2), 235-245.

  15. Montag, E.D. (n.d.) The theory of signal detection. Retrieved Oct 19, 2026, from http://www.cis.rit.edu/people/faculty/montag/vandplite/pages/chap_5/ch5p1.html

  16. Nielsen, J. (2007). Banner Blindness Revisited: Users Dodge Ads on Mobile and Desktop. Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/banner-blindness-old-and-new-findings/

  17. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological bulletin, 130 (3), 435.

  18. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  19. Samuel, L. R. (2010). Freud on Madison Avenue: Motivation research and subliminal advertising in America. University of Pennsylvania Press.

  20. Watson, D. L., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1063-1070.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list