SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

THE DETERMINANTS OF THE G7 COUNTRIES INTRA TRADE: A GRAVITY MODEL APPROACH

Tamas Anca

First published: 2025https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2025/s02.24View metrics

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the bilateral trade between G7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, United States) in the period 2005-2020. The methodology is based on gravity model, using panel data and Ordinary Least Squares Method in EViews. The Pearson Correlation, the Unit Root Test and the Hausman test were performed. Three different gravity models were performed, with the exports, the imports and the bilateral trade flows as the dependent variables. The findings are: GDP of the exporters, GDP per capita of the importers, the export openness and the export market penetration are major predictors with a positive impact on the bilateral trade, while the distance between countries, the tariff costs and the non-tariff costs have a negative impact. There were some unexpected results too. The distance and the dummies are not statistically significant. The market penetration had an unexpected negative sign for export flows and the similarity distance had a negative sign too for import flows. The originality is replacing the distance with tariff trade costs and non tariff trade costs, as well as replacing trade openness with export openness and non trade openness, which are all better predictors. Further research should be conducted using a different estimator, like PPML.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
THE DETERMINANTS OF THE G7 COUNTRIES INTRA TRADE: A GRAVITY MODEL APPROACH
Authors
Tamas Anca
Proceedings
Proceedings of 12th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2025
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2025
Pages
199-204
SWS Citekey
Anca20256199204
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-16-3
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Anderson J.E., van Wincoop E., Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle, American Economic Review, vol. 93/issue 1, pp 170–192, 2003. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455214.

  2. Baltagi B.H., Egger P., Pfaffermayr M., Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects?, Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140/issue 1, pp 260-281, 2007, September.

  3. CEPII, Gravity, 2025, https://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/bdd_modele_item.asp?id=8 .

  4. Conte M., Cotterlaz P., Mayer T., The CEPII Gravity Database, Working Papers 2022-05, CEPII Research Center, 2022.

  5. Deardorff A.V., Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?, NBER Working Papers 5377, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 1995.

  6. Frankel J.A., Cavallo E.A. Does openness to trade make countries more vulnerable to sudden stops, or less? Using gravity to establish causality, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 10957, 2004, December, http://www.nber.org/papers/w10957 .

  7. Head K., Mayer T., Ries J., The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence, Journal of International Economics, vol. 81/issue 1, pp 1–14, 2010.

  8. International Trade Center, Trade Map, 2025, https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx

  9. Novy D., Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs with Panel Data, CEP Discussion Papers dp1114, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, 2012.

  10. Objective Lists, Tag: Distance Matrix, 2025, https://objectivelists. com/tag/distance-matrix/

  11. Rose A.K., Spiegel M.M., A Gravity Model of Sovereign Lending: Trade, Default, and Credit, IMF Staff Papers, 2004, pp 50-63.

  12. Shepherd B., The Gravity Model of International Trade: A User Guide (an Updated Version), UNESCAP, 2016.

  13. Tinbergen J., Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York, 1962.

  14. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Competitive Industrial Performance (CIP), 2025, https://stat.unido.org/analytical-tools/cip? country=642 .

  15. Yoto Y.V., Piermatini R., Monteiro J.-A., Larch M., An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model, World Trade Organization, 2016.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list