SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

THE PRINCELY COUNCIL AT THE END 15TH AND EARLY 16TH CENTURY WALLACHIA – SOME ASPECTS

R. Neacsa

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCAH.2019.2/S02.026View metrics

Abstract

While the issue of the regional boyar families during the 15th and early 16th century Wallachia has already been approached, the princely council may yet be seen as a mixed up puzzle. Even if we have most of the pieces, the general picture continues to escape us. In our paper we wish to present the first results of a wider research. The study of the princely council during the reign of Radu the Great (1496-1508), but also with references to the previous reign of Vlad the Monk (1482-1496), his father, and to the one following his death, until 1512, intends to answer several questions: who were the predominant boyar families that occupied the offices? How and why did they occupy offices for such long periods of time? Was their constant presence in the council a strategy of the price to better define the circle of power upon which he relayed and which accepted his legitimacy? Our working hypothesis is that the reasons why the prince chose the council members, far from being random, were actually a strategy of constructing a network of power on which he relayed in ruling the country. Starting from the existing studies, but especially from the investigation of the existing corpus of documents, we identified some of the members of the council and their kin at the end of the 15th and the beginning of the 16th century, each file being inserted into a database that in the end will clearly display the elements of continuity and change within the political environment. Moreover, if we corroborate the statistical situation offered by the charters with other sources, we will have drawn the image of an aristocratic stratum which dominated the WallachiaВ’s political landscape during the last two decades of the 15th century. What does the study of princely council tell us, after all? That after mid15th century, after a period of severe political crisis, a group of boyars and their families started to constantly get involved into the political life of Wallachia, creating a network of power which systematically interfered with that of the Wallachian prince. This constant collaboration created a period of equilibrium which came to a brisk end after Radu the GreatВ’s death, followed by a new political crisis. They were not merely local circles of power, but they also had strong international inferences. The results obtained so far gave us confidence that the database is a useful instrument of investigating the circle of power at the end of the 15th and the beginning of the 16th centuries, under all its aspects - social, political and economic.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
THE PRINCELY COUNCIL AT THE END 15TH AND EARLY 16TH CENTURY WALLACHIA – SOME ASPECTS
Authors
R. Neacsa
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Arts and Humanities ISCAH 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
199-206
SWS Citekey
Neacsa20192199206
ISSN
2682-9940
ISBN
978-619-7408-96-6
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
ReferencesPending
Pendingreferences will be imported from Crossref/SWS source data

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list