SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

TO BE OR NOT TO BE MAINSTREAM? ATTRIBUTING OWN VIEWS TO OTHERS WHEN APPRAISING UNIQUE AND ORDINARY OBJECTS

Lenka Kostovicova

First published: 2014https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2014/B11/S1.071View metrics

Abstract

Social projection is a ubiquitous phenomenon representing attribution of own beliefs and evaluations to others. In a between-subject experiment (N = 61) and a correlation study (N = 80) we tested whether social projection is susceptible to framing (original versus typical) and which individual characteristics predict its level or guide its occurrence. In this regard, we tested indicators of perceived similarity to a target group, need for uniqueness, socio-demographic parameters, cognitive reflection, open-minded thinking and epistemic beliefs.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
TO BE OR NOT TO BE MAINSTREAM? ATTRIBUTING OWN VIEWS TO OTHERS WHEN APPRAISING UNIQUE AND ORDINARY OBJECTS
Authors
Lenka Kostovicova
Proceedings
Proceedings of 1st International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2014
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2014
Pages
547-554
SWS Citekey
Kostovicova20146547554
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7105-22-3
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References15
  1. Ames D.R. & Iyengar S. Appraising the unusual: Framing effects and moderators of uniqueness-seeking and social projection, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 41, pp 271-282, 2005.

  2. Bačová V. Rozhodnutia so závažnými dôsledkami: High-consequence decisions. In I. Sarmány-Schuller (Ed.), Otázniky rozhodovania: teória, empíria, život: 31. Psychologické dni: Zborník príspevkov, Bratislava: STIMUL, pp 14-18, 2013.

  3. Brezina I. Kognitívny a hodnotový kontext kultúrnych rozdielov v rozhodovaní. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V. Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní, Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV, pp 117-134, 2013.

  4. Čavojová V. & Hanák R. Assessing fluid rationality and its relations to cognitive styles. In T. Ahram, W. Karwowski & T. Marek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Krakow, Poland, 2014.

  5. Chan N.M., Ho I.T. & Ku K.Y.L. Epistemic beliefs and critical thinking of Chinese students, Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 21, pp 67-77, 2011.

  6. Dudeková K. Sociálne referenčné body v rizikovom rozhodovaní. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V. Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní, Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV, pp 95-116, 2013.

  7. Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, pp 25-42, 2005.

  8. Haran U., Ritov I. & Mellers B.A. The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration, Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8, pp 188-201, 2013.

  9. Hayes A.F. An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, New York: Guilford Press, 2013.

  10. Hayes A. F. & Matthes J. Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations, Behavior Research Methods, vol. 41, pp 924-936, 2009.

  11. Krueger J. The projective perception of the social world. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp 323–351, 2000.

  12. Lynn M. & Harris J. The Desire for Unique Consumer Products: A New Individual Differences Scale, Psychology and Marketing, vol. 14, pp 601–616, 1997.

  13. Masaryk R. Researching social influences on decision making: The case for qualitative methods, Human Affairs, vol. 24, pp 336-348, 2014.

  14. Schraw G., Bendixen L.D. & Dunkle M.E. Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory. In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal Epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 261-75, 2002.

  15. Toplak M.E., West R.F. & Stanovich K.E. The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks, Memory & Cognition, vol. 39, pp 1275–89, 2011.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The SSA Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

SWS Social Sciences and Arts conference
SWS Social Sciences & Arts

Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities

The joint SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities, bringing together research in society, culture, education, law, economics, humanities and the arts.

Visit sgemsocial.org
SWS Vienna When Science Meets Art
SWS Vienna - When Science Meets Art

Social Sciences, Science Meets Art

The Vienna platform for Social Sciences, interdisciplinary research and the dialogue between science, art, society and culture.

Visit sgemvienna.org
SWS Italy The Renaissance Reimagined
SWS Italy - The Renaissance Reimagined

Arts and Humanities, Renaissance Studies

The SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Arts and Humanities in Italy, Florence and Bologna, focused on culture, history, heritage, literature, philosophy, art and humanistic research.

Visit sgemitaly.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications