SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

SOREN KIERKEGAARD'S THREE CRITIQUES OF PHILOSOPHY AS METHOD

V. Vevere

First published: 2017https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2017/HB21/S06.045View metrics

Abstract

Criticism of speculative philosophy through the lens of existential communication is a theme that goes through the whole authorship of Danish religious philosopher Soren Kierkegaard; a special attention to it is paid in the works signed by Johannes Climacus. This is one of the reasons why the fore-mentioned works can be employed in researching Kierkegaard’s views on philosophy as method, or rather – his criticism of it. He speaks of the existential communication in the context of several contradictions, e.g. inwardness/outwardness; actuality/possibility; concreteness/abstraction; subjectivity/objectivity. These contradictions are explicated through the themes of subjectivity and subjective time (“Johannes Climacus”), the abstract thinking as acoustic illusion (“Philosophical Fragments”), and impossibility of the system of existence (“Concluding Unscientific Postscript”). The aim of the present paper is to follow Kierkegaard’s reflections on philosophy as method and its critique in order to come to understanding of his approach of existential communication.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
SOREN KIERKEGAARD'S THREE CRITIQUES OF PHILOSOPHY AS METHOD
Authors
V. Vevere
Proceedings
References: 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017, www.sgemvienna.org, SGEM2017 Conference Proceedings, ISBN 978-619-7105-94-0 / ISSN 2367-5659, March 28-31, Book2, Vol.1, 363-370 pp, DOI:10.5593/SGE
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2017
Pages
363-370
SWS Citekey
Vevere20176363370
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7105-94-0
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
ReferencesPending
Pendingreferences will be imported from Crossref/SWS source data

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list