SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

EXTERNALIZING AND INTERNALIZING PROBLEMS OF CHILDREN WITH AND WITHOUT OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT DISORDER: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE

E. Petric, S. Szamoskozi, K. Kalcza-Janosi

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCSS.2019.3/S11.026View metrics

Abstract

with and without oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) was examined considering their social-emotional competence (SEC). The main aim of the study was to investigate the mediating role of children SEC in the relationship between externalizing / internalizing problems and the presence of ODD. Methods: The population included a Hungarian minority group of children (N = 560, male = 50.7%), ages between 10-15 years (M = 12.13, SD = .93), and childrenВ’s parents and teachers. In the final analysis the number of the participants was 513 (with ODD subclinical status N = 50). The Hungarian versions of the following questionnaires were completed: for children the Social-Emotional Competence Questionnaire (SECQ-Hu, ? = .89) measuring childrenВ’s social-emotional competence; for parents the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL, ? = .91), measuring externalizing and internalizing problems and both parents and teachers completed the Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale (P-DBDRS, ? = .93, T-DBDRS, was ? = .94) to measure disruptive behavior problems like ODD. To examine the differences between the characteristics of children with and without ODD multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) with follow-up univariate ANOVAs was used. Multiple linear regression models were used to represent the mediation model between ODD, externalizing, internalizing problems and SEC. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in SEC components based on ODD status, approximately 20% of multivariate variance of the dependent variables is associated with the group factor after controlling for age and gender. Significant differences between the groups were found on all measured variables except the social awareness. Based on the results externalizing and total problem score of CBLC is affected the most by the ODD status. SEC is a partial mediator between ODD and externalizing problems. Conclusions: The development of the SEC in prevention programs should be a major point because of its influence on the appearance of emotional and behavioral disorders. This is supported by the results of this research that ODD children with poor social-emotional competence are in a vulnerable position for further severe externalizing problems. In more detailed research of the ODD and SEC sub-dimensions, it could be explained how these factors affect the appearance of future problems.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
EXTERNALIZING AND INTERNALIZING PROBLEMS OF CHILDREN WITH AND WITHOUT OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT DISORDER: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE
Authors
E. Petric, S. Szamoskozi, K. Kalcza-Janosi
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences ISCSS 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
197-204
SWS Citekey
Petric201911197204
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7408-93-5
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Allen, K., & Prior, M. Assessment of the validity of easy and difficult temperament through observed mother–child behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1995, Vol.18, pp. 609–630.

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.

  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, Vol.5, pp. 1173-1182.

  4. Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C., & Haynes, O. M. Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavioral adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence: Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopatology, 2010, Vol.22, pp. 715-735.

  5. Burke, J., & Loeber, R. Oppositional defiant disorder and the explanation of the comorbidity between behavioral disorders and depression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2010, Vol.17, pp. 319–326.

  6. Franco, X., Saavedra, L., & Silverman, W. External validation of comorbid patterns of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2007, Vol.21, pp. 717–729.

  7. GГЎdoros, J. SzociodemogrГЎfiai rizikГіtГ©nyezЕ‘k vizsgГЎlata gyermekviselkedГ©si kГ©rdЕ‘Г­v alkalmazГЎsГЎval, Psychiatria Hungarica, 1996, Vol.2, pp. 147-165.

  8. Kiesner, J. Depressive symptoms in early adolescence: Their relations with classroom problem behavior and peer status. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2002, Vol.12, pp. 463–478.

  9. Ladd, G. W. Social learning in the peer context. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on socialization and social development in early childhood education (pp. 133–164). Charlotte, NC: Information Age, 2007.

  10. Loeber, R., & Burke, J. D. Developmental pathways in juvenile externalizing and internalizing problems. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2011, Vol.21, pp. 34–46.

  11. Mandy, W., Skuse, D., Steer, C., Pourcain, B. S., & Oliver, B. R. Oppositionality and Socioemotional Competence: Interacting Risk Factors in the Development of Childhood Conduct Disorder Symptoms. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2013, Vol.52(7), pp. 718-727.

  12. Pelham, W.E., Gnagy, E.M., Greensalde, K.E. & Milich, R. Teacher ratings of DSM-III-R Symptoms for the disruptive behavior disorders. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1992, Vol.31(2), pp. 210-218.

  13. Petric, E. & SzamoskГ¶zi, S. Translation and adaptation of the Social-emotional Competence Questionnaire for Hungarian population. 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts. Conference Proceedings, 2018, Vol.5, pp. 527-534.

  14. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests, 2006. Retrieved from [http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm](http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm)

  15. Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R.E. Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2011, Vol.5(6), pp. 359-371.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list