Scholarly record
ON THE POSSIBIBILTY OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH WITHIN THE CONCEPTUAL FIELD OF SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY (A CASE-STUDY OF CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL THEORY)
Abstract
The purpose of the research was to study interdisciplinary as a set of theoretical assumptions and strategies that aim at a holistic approach to all varieties of disciplinary knowledge; somehow, it was stressed in the paper, that holistic principles, more often than not, presuppose associating transdisciplinarity with a certain world-picture; accordingly, the purpose of the research can be characterized as a kind of meta-theoretical methodology of the kind which always was the prerogative of philosophy. Thus understood, the research acknowledged the priority of the method which consists in critical self-reflection applied both to interdisciplinary practices and to their theoretical transformation, while the whole scope of methodological means, which were used or contemplated in the paper, included comparative, discursive, historical methods, as well as those of critical self-reflection, of scientific objectivity, etc. The research resulted in discursive clarifying of the term interdisciplinarity (its philosophical meaning and its cultural import) and in achieving a better idea of interdisciplinarity as a specifically modern phenomenon. In the process of comparative analysis, the fact of homological affinity between transdisciplinarity and political philosophy was confirmed which helped, at the final stage of the research, to reinterpret interdisciplinarity as an indispensable intermediary responsible for disciplines joint breakthrough to new cognitive horizons.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References10
Myurberg, Irina I., Towards the Problem of Political Philosophy’s Self-Justification in Terms of Social Epistemology, in Philosopical Journal, Vol. 11, № 1, 2018, p. 28-44. [In Russian].
Nicolescu B., Gurdjieff’s Philosophy of Nature URL: https://www.gurdjieff.org/G.1-2.htm (accessed on 19.04.2018).
Foucault M., Politics, philosophy, culture: interviews and other essays 1977—1984, ed. L. Kritzman. N. Y: Routledge, 1988. P. 121.
Kapustin B., Interdisciplinarity as a research and teaching strategy, Polylogos.2017. V. 1. No 2 [Electronic resource, in Russian]. Access for registered users. URL: http://polylog.jes.su/s258770110000021-5-2 (circulation date: 12.07.2018).
Eddington A., The Nature of Physical World: Gifford Lectures. Cambridge: CUP, 1927. 382 p.
Jaspers K., Origin and Goal of History, Routledge Revivals, 2011. 314 p.
Toffler A., Foreword, to Prigogine I. and Stengers I. Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bantam Books, 1984. P. vx.
Deleuze G., Difference and Repetition, tr. by Paul Patton, New York: Columbia University Press, 1994. 350 p.
Badiou A., Being and Event, tr. Oliver Feltman. L.: Bloomsbury Revelations, 2013. 600p.
Kapustin B., Interdisciplinarity Opens a Way to New Cognitive Situations, Commersant-Science. Newsletter. June 2017. P. 44. [In Russian].
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.



