SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

NAVIGATION OR LAYOUT? ELEMENTS OF WEB DESIGN AND THEIR COMBINATION ON HIGH-RANK PAGES OF UNIVERSITY WEB PORTALS

S. S. Bodrunova, S. L. Sergeev, I. S. Blekanov, A. S. Yakunin

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCSS.2019.5/S17.030View metrics

Abstract

TodayВ’s research upon efficiency of user interaction with large web portals has established links between webpage popularity and crucial elements of webpage design, such as page layout and navigation on the portal, or, more narrowly, menu design. But despite their established importance, the two aforementioned elements of web design are next to never studied together, and their relative roles in rising webpage ranks are virtually unknown. In this paper, we assess pages with high betweenness centrality within the structure of 23 most popular university web portals, basing on indices for webpage usability (U-index) and portal navigation (N-index) developed and pre-tested separately on previous stages of our research. Our results show that classic patterns of web design, such as the F-pattern in page layout and two-frame menu structure, are characteristic for most of the sampled pages. Also, we show that the pages ranked high by betweenness centrality mostly have U-index close to 0.5, while their N-index is high. This combination ensures the leading positions of these pages within the portal graph.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
NAVIGATION OR LAYOUT? ELEMENTS OF WEB DESIGN AND THEIR COMBINATION ON HIGH-RANK PAGES OF UNIVERSITY WEB PORTALS
Authors
S. S. Bodrunova, S. L. Sergeev, I. S. Blekanov, A. S. Yakunin
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences ISCSS 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
241-248
SWS Citekey
Bodrunova201917241248
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7408-95-9
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References14
  1. Bodrunova, S. S., Yakunin, A. V., Smolin, A. A. Comparing efficacy of web design of university websites: mixed methodology and first results for Russia and the USA. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, Russia, 2016, pp. 237-241.

  2. Bodrunova, S. S., Yakunin, A. V. U-index: an eye-tracking-tested checklist on webpage aesthetics for university web spaces in Russia and the USA. HCI Proceedings of the International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability, Canada, 2017, pp. 219-233.

  3. Bodrunova, S. S., Yakunin, A. Impact of menu complexity upon user behavior and satisfaction in information search. HCI Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Interface and the Management of Information, USA, 2018, pp. 55-66.

  4. Yakunin, A. V., Bodrunova, S. S., Gourieva, M. Rationality or aesthetics? navigation vs. web page ergonomics in cross-cultural use of university websites. Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet Science (INSCI’2018), Russia, pp. 169-180.

  5. Hassenzahl, M., and Monk, A. 2010. The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 3, 235–260.

  6. Garret R., Chui J., Zhang L., and Young S. D. 2016. A Literature Review: Website Design and User Engagement. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6, 3, 1-4.

  7. Zheng, G. 2015. Web Navigation Systems for Information Seeking. In M. KhosrowPour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. P. 7693.

  8. Van Oostendorp, H., R. Ignacio Madrid and Mari Carmen Puerta Melguizo. 2009. The Effect of Menu Type and Task Complexity on Information Retrieval Performance. The Ergonomics Open Journal, 2, 64-71.

  9. Galitz, W. O. 2007. The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. John Wiley & Sons.

  10. Tuch, A. N., Roth, S. P., HornbæK, K., Opwis, K., and Bargas-Avila, J. A. 2012. Is beauti-ful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and af-fect in HCI. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 5, 1596-1607.

  11. Г“ CinnГ©ide, M. and Nixon, P. 2001. Automated software evolution towards design patterns. In Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Principles of software evolution (pp. 162-165). ACM.

  12. Zaphiris, P., and Ellis, R. D. 2001. Website Usability and Content Accessibility of the top USA Universities. In WebNet (pp. 1380-1385).

  13. Hasan, L. 2012. Evaluating the usability of nine Jordanian university websites. In Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT), 2012 International Conference on (pp. 91-96). IEEE.

  14. Blekanov, I. S., Sergeev, S. L., and Martynenko, I. 2012. Construction of subjectoriented web crawlers using a generalized kernel. Scientific and technical bulletins of St.Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 5, 197, 9-15.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list