SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

BREAKING BAD NEWS' - A SHORT REVIEW OF AVAILABLE MODELS

J. Chrastina, J. Mastalir, L. Ludikova

First published: 2017https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/33/S12.014View metrics

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to present an overview of the findings about applicable models (algorithms) in the area of Breaking Bad News (BBN). The paper presents an overview of selected models with an emphasis on their practical application. The overview was produced by means of an analysis, comparison, discussion and synthesis of relevant findings. The search procedure was performed in line with the specifics of the research strategy using keywords (aimed at methodologies, procedures, and models applied in relation to the BBN process). A well-developed area is the BBN process in (adult) clients with cancer diagnoses. This is a well-designed area in terms of both methodology and feedback with an emphasis on training future doctors (professionals). The oldest and the most frequently used model is the (S)PIKES model (). Other approaches include the BREAKS model, Kaye’s Ten Step Approach, NURSE model, ABCDE model, PEWTER model, etc. Less frequently used models include for example “In Person, In Time”, COMFORT, The 3phase model, SBAR, TALK, ASK–TELL–ASK model, Breaking Bad News Skills Rating Form Checklist (BBN Skills), relevant derived models and some other models. The components of the SPIKES model follow the chronology of the BBN process; other models more or less copy the chronology (including various alternatives adapted to the needs of a specific model). The models use the following components: preparation – setting (up the interview/interaction) – perception (patient’s perception and preparation) – invitation (obtaining the patient’s invitation; information; invitation or information; invitation and information needs) – knowledge (giving knowledge and information to patient; knowledge of the condition) – emotions (addressing the patient’s emotions with empathetic response; empathy; empathy and exploration) – strategy (strategy and summary; summary; summarize or strategize; summary and strategic planning). The process of BBN is a comprehensive and very important communicative competence of each professional. Breaking unfavourable (bad) news is one of the most significant and at the same time difficult forms of clinical practice and requires a set of skills that professionals should learn as routine part of their training. The learning process is an essential component of undergraduate preparation of future professionals.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
BREAKING BAD NEWS' - A SHORT REVIEW OF AVAILABLE MODELS
Authors
J. Chrastina, J. Mastalir, L. Ludikova
Proceedings
4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2017
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2017
Pages
101-108
SWS Citekey
Chrastina201712101108
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7408-20-1
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References15
  1. Fallowfield, L., Jenkins, V., Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine, Lancet, vol. 363, pp 312-319, 2004.

  2. Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E. A., Kudelka, A. P., SPIKES—A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer, Oncologist, vol. 5, pp 302-311, 2000.

  3. Butow, P. N., Kazemi, J. N., Beeney, L. J., Griffin, A. M., Dunn, S. M., Tattersall, M. H., When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences, Cancer, vol. 77, pp 2630-2637, 1996.

  4. Buckman, R. A., Breaking Bad News: The S-P-I-K-E-S strategy, Community Oncology, vol. 2, pp 138-142, 2005.

  5. Becze, E., Strategies for Breaking Bad News to Patients with Cancer, Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, vol. 25, pp 14-15, 2010.

  6. Buckman, R., How to Break Bad News: A Guide for Health Care Professionals, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1992.

  7. Seifart, C., Hofmann, M., Bär, T., Riera Knorrenschild, J., Seifart, U., Rief, W., Breaking bad news – what patients want and what they get: evaluating the SPIKES protocol in Germany. Annals of Oncology, vol. 25, pp 707-711, 2014.

  8. Gilbey, P., Qualitative analysis of parents’ experience with receiving the news of the detection of their child's hearing loss, International Journal of Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 74, pp 265-270, 2010.

  9. Hafidz, M. I. A., Zainudin, L. D., Breaking Bad News: An essential skill for doctors, Medical Journal of Malaysia, vol. 71, pp 26-27, 2016.

  10. Rabow, M. W., What cancer patients want to know: national strategies and individual needs, The Western Journal of Medicine, vol. 173, pp 31-32, 2000.

  11. Narayanan, V., Bista, B., Koshy, Ch., ‘BREAKS’ Protocol for Breaking Bad News, Indian Journal of Palliative Care, vol. 16, pp 61-65, 2010.

  12. Nardi, T. J., Keefe-Cooperman, K., Communicating bad news: a model for emergency mental health helpers, International journal of emergency mental health, vol. 8, pp 203-207, 2006.

  13. Watson, L., A., P., Informing Critical Care Patients of a Loved One’s Death, Critical Care Nurse, vol. 28, pp 53-63, 2008.

  14. Arezoo Ebn Ahmady, Shabnam Seyedzadeh Sabounchi, Hoori Mirmoham-madsadeghi, Angelayalda Rezaei, A Suitable Model for Breaking Bad News: Review of Recommendations, JMED Research, vol. 2014, pp 15, 2014.

  15. Waxler, J. L., Cherniske, E. M., Dieter, K., Herd, P., Pober, B. R., Hearing from parents: the impact of receiving the diagnosis of Williams syndrome in their child, American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 3, pp 534-541, 2013.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The SSA Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

SWS Social Sciences and Arts conference
SWS Social Sciences & Arts

Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities

The joint SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities, bringing together research in society, culture, education, law, economics, humanities and the arts.

Visit sgemsocial.org
SWS Vienna When Science Meets Art
SWS Vienna - When Science Meets Art

Social Sciences, Science Meets Art

The Vienna platform for Social Sciences, interdisciplinary research and the dialogue between science, art, society and culture.

Visit sgemvienna.org
SWS Italy The Renaissance Reimagined
SWS Italy - The Renaissance Reimagined

Arts and Humanities, Renaissance Studies

The SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Arts and Humanities in Italy, Florence and Bologna, focused on culture, history, heritage, literature, philosophy, art and humanistic research.

Visit sgemitaly.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

SWS scientific publications gain international visibility through a broad network of scholarly indexing and abstracting databases, citation-tracking services, research discovery platforms, and academic repositories.

Depending on the platform, our publications may be accessible as indexed bibliographic records, abstracts, citation data, DOI-linked metadata, or full-text scientific papers. Coverage and availability vary across platforms and publication years.