Scholarly record
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE: A USER-ORIENTED PROCEDURE TO ASSESSING PREFERENCES UNDER RISK
Abstract
According to the behavioral finance theory, agents act coherently with the Kahneman and Tversky prospect paradigms and may violate those dictated by the rational expected utility. From the point of view of real financial markets' applications, a key question concerns how to eliciting the financial professionals' risk preferences. In this contribution we propose the benchmarking procedure originally set up by Castagnoli & LiCalzi (1996) and Bordley & LiCalzi (2000) that couples sound axiomatic fundamentals with a user-friendly language. According to the benchmarking modelling, to maximizing the expected cardinal utility is equivalent to maximizing the probability to meet a (uncertain) goal. It follows that the subjective preferences under risk can be expressed in terms of the probability of matching financial benchmarks. Since practitioners may feel more comfortable in answering questions involving perceived probability of meeting commitments than expressing preferences on lotteries' outcomes, the use of the benchmarking modelling is expected to reduce inconsistency in questionnaires.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
Abdellaoui M., Bleichrodt H. & Kammoun H. Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study, Theory Decisions, vol. 74, pp 11–429, 2013.
Bordley R. & LiCalzi M. Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions in Economics and Finance, vol. 23, pp 53-74, 2000.
Bordley R., Tibiletti L. & Uberti M. A target-oriented approach: a “one-size” model to suit Humans and Econs behaviors, submitted, 2014.
Bordley R., Culasso F., Giacosa E. & Tibiletti L. Behavioral Agency Model: A Target-Oriented Approach for Executive Incentives, in “Proceedings of The International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Economics and Management Study - SEM 2014”, University of Westminster, London, UK, 01-02 June, 2014, pp. 88-92, ISBN no. 978-1-63248-011-8. doi: 10.15224/ 978-1-63248- 011-8-58, 2014.
Castagnoli E. & LiCalzi M. Expected Utility without Utility. Theory and Decision, vol. 41/issue 3, pp 281-301, 1996.
Charness G., Gneezy U. & Imas A. Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 87, pp 43-51, 2013.
Conine, T. E. Estimating the Probability of Meeting Financial Commitments: A Behavioral Finance Perspective Based on Business Simulations. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, vol. 33, pp 6–13, 2014.
Goldstein D.G. & Rothschild D. Lay understanding of probability distributions, Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9/issue 1, pp. 1–14, 2014.
Gurevich, G., Kliger, D. & Levy, O. Decision-making under uncertainty: A field study of cumulative prospect theory, Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 33, pp 1221–1229, 2009.
Health C., Larrick R. & Wu G. Goals as Reference Points, Cognitive Psychology, vol. 38, pp 79-109, 1999.
Kahneman D. & Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk, Econometrica, vol. 47/issue 2, pp 263-91, 1979.
Savage, L.J. The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley, 1954.
Sharpe, W. F., Goldstein D.G. & Blythe P.W. The Distribution Builder: A Tool for Inferring Investor Preferences. Retrieved 2008-02-27. Available online http://www.webcitation.org/5VvlvXKhu, (2000-10-10)
Von Neumann J. & Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princenton University Press. Second Edition, 1947.
Yao J. & Li D. Prospect theory and trading patterns, Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 37, pp 2793–2805, 2013.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
