SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

BEING INTENTIONAL AND PURPOSEFUL WHEN WORKING WITH ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

J. Brymer-Bashore, J. Elzy, J. Williams

First published: 2019https://doi.org/10.5593/SWS.ISCSS.2019.4/S13.009View metrics

Abstract

Serving English language learners (ELLs) has been a major focus of the Reading Recovery (RR) early literacy intervention since its inception in New Zealand and continues to be a focus in the United States. In 2017-18, in the United States, RR served more than 6,000 ELL students in 1st grade. A recent randomized control trial conducted over 4 years, with 6,888 students, of which 19% were ELL, concluded, The growth rate we observed in students who participated in Reading Recovery over approximately a five-month period was 131 percent of the national average rate for 1st-grade students. Moreover, these results were similar in two subgroups of interest to the i3 program: English Language Learners and students in rural schools. (May et al.,2016, Reading Recovery: An Evaluation of the Four-Year i3 Scale-Up, pg. 3). Teachers must be intentional and purposeful when planning for lessons and working with all students. For ELL students, this may include spending more time focusing on oral language development. This thoughtfulness may also include being aware of the idiosyncrasies in the English language, such as the lack of gender specific word endings, the curious nature of prepositions, and how the inflection of words can impact the meaning of a sentence. In this paper we explore the intentional techniques embedded in the framework of a RR lesson and demonstrate why they are important to the language acquisition process and overall literacy development of ELL students.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
BEING INTENTIONAL AND PURPOSEFUL WHEN WORKING WITH ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Authors
J. Brymer-Bashore, J. Elzy, J. Williams
Proceedings
6th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences ISCSS 2019
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
61-76
SWS Citekey
Brymer-Bashore2019136176
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-619-7408-94-2
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References15
  1. Ashdown, J., & Simic, O. (2000) Is early literacy intervention effective for English language learners? Evidence from Reading Recovery. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 5(1), 27-42.

  2. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  3. Clay, M.M. (2016). Literacy lessons designed for individuals. (2nd ed.) Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  4. Clay, M.M. (2015) Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  5. Clay, M. M. (1993). Reading Recovery: A Guidebook for Teachers in Training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  6. D'Agostino, J.V., Rodgers, E., & Mauck, S. (2018). Addressing Inadequacies of the Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 53( 1), 51– 69. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.181

  7. D’Agostino, J (2012). U.S. Norms and Correlations for An Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. Columbus: International Data Evaluation Center, The Ohio State University.

  8. Hobsbaum, A. (1997). Reading Recovery in England. In S.L. Swartz & A. F. Klein (Eds.), Research in Reading Recovery (pp. 132-147). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  9. International Data Evaluation Center (2018), 2017-2018 Reading Recovery National Summary Report for the United States. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, Available at http://www.idecweb.us/publications.aspx [Verified 13 May 2019]

  10. Lomax, R.G. & Hahs-Vaughn, D.L. (2012). An introduction to statistical concepts (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

  11. May, H., Sirinides, P., Gray, A., & Goldsworthy, H. (2016). Reading Recovery: An Evaluation of the Four-Year i3 Scale-Up. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

  12. National Center for Education statistics (2018) Digest of Education statistics, Available at https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2018menu_tables.asp [Verified 13 May 2019]

  13. Neal, J. and Kelly, P. R. (1999). The Success of Reading Recovery for English Language Learners and Descrubiendo La Lectura for Bilingual Students in California. Literacy, Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 4(2), 81-108.

  14. Smith, P. (1994). Reading Recovery and Children with English as a Second Language. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 29(2), 141-159.

  15. Van Dyke, J. (2006). When conversations go well: Investigating oral language development in Reading Recovery. The Journal of Reading Recovery, 5(2), 25-33.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list