SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

VISUAL ART, AS DOMAIN SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE IN VISUAL STIMULI COMPREHENSION: A META-ANALYTICAL REVIEW OF ART AND NON-ART EXPERTS' EYE FIXATION DURATION

Borbala Tamas, Liviu Andrei Fodor, Bernadette Galfi, Andrea Barta, Istvan Szamoskozi

First published: 2022https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2022/s06.064View metrics

Abstract

Previously published studies show a clear difference between the eye movement patterns of artists and non-artists. However, the findings of some studies show that the duration of eye fixation increases as a result of artistic expertise, while other studies show the opposite. In this meta-analysis, we included the findings from 14 studies in which the effect of artistic expertise on the duration of eye fixation was examined. We also examined the potential moderating effect of task type, level of expertise, the type of stimulus presentation, the task time limit, the sampling rate and gender influence on the effect size. Results from 14 studies were pooled, resulting in a medium effect size (ES) of g = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.03, meaning that eye fixation duration was longer for artists than nonartists. We identified substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 75%, 95% CI: 59 to 85) among studies, but very little evidence for publication bias. None of the investigated study variables were significant moderators of the effect size. These findings suggest that artistic expertise has a significant effect on eye fixation duration. Although the differences are clear between artists and non-artists, other factors that may have influence on the duration of eye fixation remain unclear.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2

Publication details

Title
VISUAL ART, AS DOMAIN SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE IN VISUAL STIMULI COMPREHENSION: A META-ANALYTICAL REVIEW OF ART AND NON-ART EXPERTS' EYE FIXATION DURATION
Authors
Borbala Tamas, Liviu Andrei Fodor, Bernadette Galfi, Andrea Barta, Istvan Szamoskozi
Proceedings
Proceedings of 9th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2022
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2022
Pages
545-552
SWS Citekey
Tamas20226545552
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-04-0
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References11
  1. Gegenfurtuner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Saljo, R., Expertise Differences in the Comprehension of Visualizations: a Meta-Analysis of Eye-Tracking Research in Professional Domains, Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 23, pp. 523-552, , 2011.

  2. Harland, B., Gillett, J., Mann, C., M., Kass, J., Godwin, H. J., Liversedge, S. P., & Donnelly, N., Modes of Address in Pictorial Art: An Eye Movement Study of Manet’s Bar at the Foiles-Bergere. LEONARDO, vol. 47/3, 241-247, 2014.

  3. Koide, N., Kubo, T., Nishida, S., Shibata, T., & Ikeda, K., Art Expertise Reduce Influence of Visual Salience on Fixation in Viewing Abstract- Paintings. PLoSOne, vol. 10/2, e0117696, 2015.

  4. Kolodziej, A., Rak, R. J., Francuz, P., & Augustynowicz, P., Identifying experts in the field of visual arts using oculomotor signals. Journal of Eye Movement Research, vol. 11/ 3. 2018.

  5. Tchalenko, J., Eye movements in drawing simple lines. Perception, vol. 36, pp. 1152-1167, 2007.

  6. Klein, C., Betz, J., Hirschubel, M., Fuchs, C., Schmiedtova, B., Engelbrecht, M., Mueller/Paul, J., & Rosenberg, R., Describing Art- An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Effects of Speaking on Gaze Movements during the Beholding Of Paintings. PLoSONE, vol. 9/12, e102439, 2014.

  7. Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I., Statistical methods for Meta-analysis. Academic Press, 1985.

  8. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., & Rothstein, H.R., Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2009.

  9. Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C., Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), vol. 315, pp. 629–634, 1997.

  10. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R., Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, vol. 56, pp. 455– 463, 2000.

  11. Kahler, T. S., Jacobsen, Th. Klein, S., & Wendt, M., Anticipatory Defocusing of Attention and Contextual Response Priming but no Role of Aesthetic Appreciation in Simple Symmetry Judgments when Switching between Tasks. Symmetry, vol. 12, pp. 577, 2020.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list