SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

DO WE ALWAYS PREFER THE DEVIL WE KNOW? SOCIAL INFLUENCE ON AMBIGUITY AVERSION

Lenka Kostovicova

First published: 2014https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2014/B11/S1.018View metrics

Abstract

People strongly prefer options with exact probabilities of outcomes to those with uncertain probabilities, expressing ambiguity aversion. Its manifestations are reflected in various domains of real-life decisions, particularly among monetary choices. Recent research suggests amplification of ambiguity avoidance under social influence, however with several methodological limitations. Therefore, we tested the effects of accountability and responsibility on aversion towards ambiguity in two between-subject experiments (N = 257). Contrary to previous evidence, we found no support for the effect of expected social consequences on frequency of ambiguity-averse choices.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
DO WE ALWAYS PREFER THE DEVIL WE KNOW? SOCIAL INFLUENCE ON AMBIGUITY AVERSION
Authors
Lenka Kostovicova
Proceedings
Proceedings of 1st International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2014
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2014
Pages
129-136
SWS Citekey
Kostovicova20146129136
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7105-22-3
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References15
  1. Bašnáková J. Skúmanie sociálnych vplyvov na rozhodovanie: Kvantitatívne metódy. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V. Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní, Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV, pp 17-43, 2013.

  2. Brezina I. Multikultúrny výskum osobnostných aspektov rozhodovania. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V. Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní, Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV, pp 135-150, 2013.

  3. Camerer C.F. & Weber M. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 5, pp 325–370, 1992.

  4. Curley S.P., Yates J.F. & Abrams R.A. Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 38, pp 230– 256, 1986.

  5. Dudeková K. Sociálne referenčné body v rizikovom rozhodovaní. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V. Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní, Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV, pp 95-116, 2013.

  6. Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 75, pp 643–669, 1961.

  7. Lerner J.S. & Tetlock P.E. Accounting for the effects of accountability, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 125, pp 255–275, 1999.

  8. Masaryk R. Researching social influences on decision making: The case for qualitative methods, Human Affairs, vol. 24, pp 336-348, 2014.

  9. Pahlke J., Strasser S. & Vieider F.M. Responsibility effects in decision making under risk, Discussion paper no. 2010-37, Munich: Department of Economics, University of Munich, 2010.

  10. Rode C., Cosmides L., Hell W. & Tooby J. When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory, Cognition, vol. 72, pp 269–304, 1999.

  11. Rouder J.N., Speckman P.L., Sun D., Morey R.D. & Iverson G. Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 16, pp 225–237. 2009.

  12. Sirota M., Kostovičová L. & Juanchich M. The effect of iconicity of visual displays on statistical reasoning: evidence in favor of the null hypothesis, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 21, pp 961-968, 2014.

  13. Tetlock P.E. The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a Social contingency model, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25, pp 331–376, 1992.

  14. Trautmann S.T. & Vieider F.M. Social influences on risk attitudes: Applications in economics. In R. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sand & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory. Epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk, London: Springer, pp 575–600, 2012.

  15. Trautmann S.T., Vieider F.M. & Wakker P.P. Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 36, pp 225– 243, 2008.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The SSA Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

SWS Social Sciences and Arts conference
SWS Social Sciences & Arts

Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities

The joint SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities, bringing together research in society, culture, education, law, economics, humanities and the arts.

Visit sgemsocial.org
SWS Vienna When Science Meets Art
SWS Vienna - When Science Meets Art

Social Sciences, Science Meets Art

The Vienna platform for Social Sciences, interdisciplinary research and the dialogue between science, art, society and culture.

Visit sgemvienna.org
SWS Italy The Renaissance Reimagined
SWS Italy - The Renaissance Reimagined

Arts and Humanities, Renaissance Studies

The SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Arts and Humanities in Italy, Florence and Bologna, focused on culture, history, heritage, literature, philosophy, art and humanistic research.

Visit sgemitaly.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications