Scholarly record
ONTOLOGY OF SENSE AND NEW INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
Abstract
Nowadays many versions of ontology are loosing their meaning completely or partial. It happens because of various reasons. First of all, the development of information technologies and human sciences, which are influence more and more on the life on the contemporary man, and make him to rethink about the problems of being, and contact with it. Secondary, the process of aesthetisation is getting stronger, and that's why increase the role of the being of the things in the everyday structures. In these case, we pay attention to the role, which play non-hermeneutic and perceptive factors in the cognition of the world. Thirdly, it can be related to the increasing fashion on various methodological syntheses with primary reference to transdisciplinarity. For the fourth, distribution of hermeneutical researches and researches in area of philosophy of sign, their essence modifications and alteration of many segments of humanitarian knowledge create terms for constructing of update versions of ontology, which would take into account all complication, meaningfulness and polymodal character of sign existence. Sense is referred to as one of the central categories of hermeneutics and philosophy of sigh. The prospects of research of sense are in the field of newest aesthetics.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References14
G. Vattimo, “The age of interpretation” in G. Vattimo, R. Rorty, The future of religion, 2005, N.-Y.: Columbia University Press, pp. 43-54.
W. Welsch, Undoing aesthetics, London: Sage Publications, 1998.
M. Seel, Aesthetics of appearing, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.
H.U. Gumbrecht, Production of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.
H.U. Gumbrecht, In 1926: living at the edge of time, Cambridge, Massachussets, London: Harvard University Press, 1997.
H.U. Gumbrecht, In Praise of Athletic Beauty, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.
H.U. Gumbrecht, Production of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004, p. 11.
M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer verlag, 1967, S.151-152.
J. Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976, p.294-312.
G. Deleuze, F. Guattari, “On Several Regimes of Signs” in G. Deleuze, F. Guattari, A thousand plateaus. Capitalizm and schizophrenia, Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 2005, p. 111–118.
G. Deleuze, Negotiations 1972-1990, trans. by Martin Joughin, New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
G. Deleuze, F. Guattari, “Treatise on Nomadology” in G. Deleuze, F. Guattari A thousand plateaus. Capitalizm and schizophrenia, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005, p. 351–423.
M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer verlag, 1967, S.151.
A. Schutz, Reflections on the Problem of Relevance, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
