SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

THE DEATH SENTENCE IN MALAYSIA: A SOCIO-LEGAL REVIEW

Sook Ling Lee, Guru Dhillon

First published: 2022https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2022/s02.017View metrics

Abstract

Malaysia continues to retain the death sentence despite the fact that there is a global inclination towards abolishing the death sentence. In this paper, the authors firstly, assessed whether authorities in Malaysia have reviewed the death sentence in Malaysia. Secondly, the authors examined the deterrence effect of the death sentence and then explored the possibility of miscarriage of justice caused by the death sentence. The authors opted for a qualitative legal research method and a doctrinal research method. The authors collected data from relevant legislation, case law, textbooks, journal articles, statistical reports, press reports, and reliable websites. The authors determined the deterrence effect of the death sentence by referring to the statistical reports and press reports retrieved from relevant institutions in Malaysia and the United States of America. This paper serves as a good source of reference to legislators, lawyers, academics, students, and the public at large and it creates an awareness of the current state of affairs in Malaysia regarding the imposition of the death sentence.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 13

Publication details

Title
THE DEATH SENTENCE IN MALAYSIA: A SOCIO-LEGAL REVIEW
Authors
Sook Ling Lee, Guru Dhillon
Proceedings
Proceedings of 9th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2022
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2022
Pages
131-138
SWS Citekey
Lee20222131138
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-04-0
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Keywords
References18
  1. Death Penalty Information Center. (2020, December 31). Abolitionist and retentionist countries. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/international/abolitionist-andretentionist-countries

  2. Dass, R. A. S. (2019). Death penalty in Malaysia: To abolish or not to abolish? Malayan Law Journal 2 (xliv), 1-32. ISSN: 0025-1283.

  3. Lim, C. H., Ngeow C. Y., & Arivananthan, H. (2018). High incidence of judicial errors in capital punishment cases in Malaysia. Penang Institute Issues, 1-12.

  4. United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. (2022). Ratification status for Malaysia. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/TreatyBodyExternal/Treaty.aspx?CountryID=10 5&Lang=EN

  5. United Nations Human Rights. (n.d.). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/internationalcovenant-civil-and-political-rights

  6. Putri, D. K. (2019). Interpreting ‘most serious crimes’ under Article 6(2) of ICCPR. Mimbar Hukum 31(3), 419-437. ISSN: 0852-100X, 2443-0994.

  7. Antolak-Saper, N., Kowal, S., Lindsey, S., Ngeow, C. Y., & Kananatu, T. (2020). Drug offences and the death penalty in Malaysia: fair trial rights and ramifications. Monash University Australia Publication.

  8. Lotfi, N. (2008). Chapter One – The Selection of Research Approach. SAGE Publication. ISSN: 2158-2440.

  9. Yaqin, A. (2007). Legal Research and Writing. Malayan Law Journal. ISBN: 9679628248, 9789679628241

  10. Novak, A. (2014). The future of the mandatory death penalty in Malaysia and Singapore: “Asian values” and abolition in comparative perspective, with implications for Indonesia. Legal Network Series, (A) 1(iv), 1-14. ISSN: 2338-7602, 2338-770X.

  11. Surendranath, A., Vishwanath, N., & Dash, P. P. (2021). Penological Justifications as Sentencing Factors in Death Penalty Sentencing. Journal of National Law University Delhi 6(2), 107-125. DOI: 10.1177/2277401720972852

  12. Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (2004). Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24(2), 173-205. DOI: 10.1093/ojls/24.2.173

  13. Girelli, G. (2019). The Death Penalty for Drug Offences: Global Overview 2018. Harm Reduction International Publication.

  14. Department of Statistics Malaysia (2021, November 25). Crime statistics, 2021. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=455& bul_id=eHE0eGZWSmNROG1BbHR2TzFvZzZxQT09&menu_id=U3VPMldoYUxzV zFaYmNkWXZteGduZz09

  15. Department of Statistics Malaysia (2019, November 27). Crime statistics, 2019. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=455& bul_id=MEs4QzNxWkNZZDEyM08yM0Jsd05vQT09&menu_id=U3VPMldoYUxzVz FaYmNkWXZteGduZz09

  16. Department of Statistics Malaysia (2018, December 28). Crime statistics, 2018. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=455&bul_id=Sn JlWjNGZ3VWajUraDlBcFpMQ3JWUT09&menu_id=U3VPMldoYUxzVzFaYmNkW XZteGduZz09

  17. Morris, P. (2021, February 18). Sentenced to death, but innocent: These are stories of justice gone wrong. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/sentenced-todeath-but-innocent-these-are-stories-of-justice-gone-wrong

  18. Dhillon, G., Mohammed, N., & Ng. Y. M. (2012). Capital punishment in Malaysia and globally: “A tool for justice or a weapon against humanity. Legal Network Series 1 (A), 1-23. ISSN: 2338-7602, 2338-770X.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list