SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

PARTICULARITIES OF REMEDIES IN THE MATTER OF AWARDING PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS IN ROMANIA

Emilia Lucia Catana

First published: 2024https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2024/s02/14View metrics

Abstract

The overall purpose of this paper is the analysis of remedies in the matter of awarding public procurement contracts, with emphasis on the Romanian case, in the context of EU law. Methodologically, the study aims to analyse Romanian Law no. 101/2016 on appeals and remedies for the award of public contracts, sectorial contracts and works concession contracts and service concession contracts, as well as for the organization and operation of the National Council for the Settlement of Complaints. This law transposes the Directive 89/665/EEC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions on the application of review procedures for the award of public supply contracts and public works contracts and Directive 92/13/EEC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities engaged in activities in the sectors of water, energy, transport and telecommunications. The critical approach also takes into account doctrinal studies, given that remedy legislation has been applied in Romania since 2016. The results of the research highlight that Romania has transposed the European directives and the case law reflects certain peculiarities of remedies in public procurement that are a continuous challenge for theoreticians and practitioners.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
No metrics available.

Publication details

Title
PARTICULARITIES OF REMEDIES IN THE MATTER OF AWARDING PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS IN ROMANIA
Authors
Emilia Lucia Catana
Proceedings
Proceedings of 11th SWS International Scientific Conference on Social Sciences - ISCSS 2024
Publisher
SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Scholarly Society
Year
2024
Pages
215-222
SWS Citekey
Catana20243215222
ISSN
2682-9959
ISBN
978-3-903438-10-1
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References15
  1. Waline,J., Eckert G., Muller, E. (2023), Droit administratif, 29e edition, Dalloz, p.10- 11.

  2. Szente, Z. (2017), Conceptualising the Principle of Effective legal protection in Administrative law, in Szente, Z., Lachmayer, K. (eds.), The Principle of Effective legal protection in Administrative law. A European Comparison, Routledge, p.5;

  3. Lajoye, Ch. (2023), Droit des marches publics, Lextenso, p.26.;

  4. Law no. 101/2016 regarding remedies and means of appeal in the matter of public procurement contract awarding, sectorial contracts and works and services concession contracts, as well as regarding the organisation and operation of the National Council for the Settlement of Complaints, published in the Official Gazette of Romania, no. 393 of 23 May 2016;

  5. Constantinescu, M., Iorgovan, A., Muraru, I., Tanasescu, E.S. (2004), Constitu?ia Romaniei revizuita-comentarii ?i explica?ii, Ed. All Beck, Bucure?ti, p. 34 ?i urm., apud Apostol Tofan, D. (2017), Drept administrativ, vol. II, ed. 4, CH Beck Publishing House, Bucharest, p. 122;

  6. For an analysis of this independent body at the stage of validity of GEO No 34/2006, see, Lazar, I. (2011), Jurisdic?ii administrative in materie financiara, Universul Juridic Publishing House, Bucharest, pp.224-305; Catana, M. C. (2011), Achizi?ii publice,Universul Juridic Publishing House, Bucharest, pp.225-234;

  7. Lajoye, Ch. (2017), Droit des marches publics, 6 edition, Gualino editeur, Lextenso editions, Issy-les-Moulineaux cedex, p. 154;

  8. C.N.S.C., Resolution no. 939/C1/864 of 7 May 2021, p.11; source: www.portal.cnsc.ro

  9. The Romanian Administrative Code was approved by Emergency Ordinance no. 57 of 5 July 2019

  10. Vedina?, V. (2023), La responsabilite financiere de la gestion publique en Roumanie, in Damarey, S. (coord.), Responsabilite financiere des gestionnaires publics. Approches internationales, Mare & Martin, pp.257-272. (P.258).

  11. See, Tanquerel, Th. (2021), Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Switzerland, in Giacinto della Cananea, Mads Andenas (eds), Judicial Review of Administration in Europe, Oxford University Press, p.75,DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198867609.001.0001

  12. Suceava Court of Appeal, Decision no. 440/2022 and Decision no. 329/2021,www.scj.ro.;

  13. Trailescu, A., (2018), Legea contenciosului administrativ. Comentarii ?i explica?ii, edi?ia 4, CH Beck Publishing House, Bucharest, p.284-285.

  14. For details, see Catana, E. L. (2016), Exercitarea nelimitata a liberta?ii deapreciere– expresie a excesului de putere al autorita?ilor contractante in atribuirea contractului de achizi?ie publica. Cenzurabilitatea acesteia in contenciosul achizi?iilor publice, Revista de Drept Public/ Public Law Review, no. 2/2016, pp.106-110.

  15. The National Agency for Public Procurement was founded by Government Emergency Ordinance no. 13/2015, published in Official Gazette no. 362 of 26 May 2015, as a public institution with legal personality, subordinated to the Ministry of Public Finance

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list