Scholarly record
THE IMAGE OF GYPSIES IN THE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN SOCIETY
Abstract
The Gypsies are one of the most controversial ethnic groups. Periodically the actions of Gypsies (including their individual representatives) cause such violent surges of discontent that can be settled only by law enforcement authorities. For example, in August 2016 in Ukrainian village of Loschinovka there were pogroms of houses inhabited by Gypsy families, in response to the murder of a local girl by a Gypsy; in March 2016, in Tula village of Plekhanovo enforcement authorities were engaged in connection with the illegal tapping into the gas pipeline by the local Gypsies, etc. This paper studies public perception of Gypsies, forcing violent and abrupt reactions of other people to actions of Gypsies; it also investigates the causes of such perception, ways of their formation and possibilities of their change. The study is based on the discussion in the Live journal in August 2016, initiated by a Gypsy, in which young parents took part. The research method is narrative analysis. The contributing opinions to the discussion (more than 400), have been analyzed from the perspective of the image, the Russians have of Gypsies, and the features that are considered most typical. The following components of the image of Gypsies were analyzed in the study: appearance, places of settlement, types of employment, victims of Gypsies, techniques for resisting Gypsies, attitude to Gypsies, attitude of Gypsies towards Gypsies and non-Gypsies, ways to change the attitude towards Gypsies. The Gypsies are identified by the representatives of other ethnic groups primarily by their appearance, occupation and places of settlement. The victims of illegal actions of Gypsies are mainly women. The techniques to resist Gypsies are ignoring them, using their own methods, search for protection. Gypsies clearly identify people as their own kind and others, which they appear to do on the basis of blood relations. They actively and even aggressively protect people of their own kind; the attitude to others is bad. Gypsies believe constructivism is the means to change the attitude of other people towards them. Representatives of other ethnic groups believe that constructivism can be applied only on the basis of Gypsies modifying their own behaviour.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
Rowe L. & Goodman S. "A stinking filthy race of people inbred with criminality" A discourse analysis of prejudicial talk about Gypsies in discussion forums, Romani Studies, vol. 24/issue 1, pp 25-42, 2014.
Jensen T. & Ringrose J. Sluts that choose Vs doormat gypsies, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 14/issue 3, pp 369-387, 2014.
Gypsy pogrom after the murder of a child in Odessa region. Topical, Medusa. – Available at: https://meduza.io/feature/2016/08/30/tsyganskiy-pogrom-posle-ubiystva-rebenka-v-odesskoy-oblasti-glavnoe
The revolt of Gypsies in Tula region. Brief. Why was OMON brought to the village of Plekhanovo, Medusa. – Available at: https://meduza.io/feature/2016/03/17/bunt-tsygan-v-tulskoy-oblasti-korotko
Surdu M. & Kovats M. Roma identity as an expert-political construction, Social Inclusion, vol. 3/issue 5, pp 5-18, 2015.
Fekete L. Europe against the Roma, Race and Class, vol. 55/issue 3, pp 60-70, 2014.
Koptseva N.P. & Reznikova K.V. Refinement of the Causes of Ethnic Migration North Selkups Based on the Historical Memory of Indigenous Ethnic Groups Turukhansk District of Krasnoyarsk Krai, Bylye Gody, vol. 38/ issue 4, pp 1028-1038, 2015.
Gay y Blasco, P. ‘It's the best place for them’: normalising Roma segregation in Madrid, Social Antropology, vol. 24/issue 4, pp 446–461, 2016.
Acton T.A. Scientific racism, popular racism and the discourse of the Gypsy Lore Society, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 39/issue 7, pp 1187-1204, 2016.
Picker G. & Greenfields M. & Smith, D. Colonial refractions: the ‘Gypsy camp’ as a spatio-racial political technology, City, vol. 19/issue 5, pp 741-752, 2015.
Ryder A. & Cemlyn S. Monoculturalism, austerity and moral panics: Assessing government progress on addressing Gypsy, Traveller and Roma exclusion, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, vol. 24/issue 2, pp 143-155, 2016.
Surdu M. & Kovats M. Roma identity as an expert-political construction, Social Inclusion, vol. 3/issue 5, pp 5-18, 2015.
Tremlett A. Making a difference without creating a difference: Super-diversity as a new direction for research on Roma minorities, Ethnicities, vol. 14/issue 6, pp 830-848, 2014.
Marushiakova E. & Popov V. European policies for social inclusion of Roma: Catch 22?, Social Inclusion, vol. 3/issue 5, pp 19-31, 2015.
Lashe tes, Russian sisters!, Live journal "Kids". – Available at: http://malyshi.livejournal.com/55739509.html?thread=1487011445#t1487011445
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
