Scholarly record
BOREDOM IN PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTICE AND EXISTENTIAL THERAPY APPROACHES
Abstract
This paper considers boredom as a non-authentic modus of human existence, which includes emptiness of life and absence of fullness, as the opposite to an authentic modus, which means living full and meaningful life. From the one hand, by contrast, it could be used as a source of inspiration. From the other hand, from the deeper point of view, it could be used as an opportunity to manage self-transformation. We also used a classification of types of boredom by M. Heidegger - from the routine to the deep existential. We discuss similarities and differenties of the approaches to boredom in philosophical practice and existential psychotherapy. At the latter boredom could be related to the individual's isolation and to the meaningless life. Finally, a client could achieve the level of "normality", improve the quality of interpersonal relations and make his life meaningful. In the philosophical practice, boredom could be related to the overcoming of the routine life and to yearning for the deeper dimension of life.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
ReferencesPending
Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.