Scholarly record
ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY OF WORK IN A COMPANY
Abstract
In this article, the essence and significance of the productivity of work in operation activities of the company are presented. The purpose of the study was to examine relations between the level of the productivity of work and the work resources in companies. The research was conducted in Polish large-sized companies of the construction industry. The conducted analysis in the examined companies the effect of which are complete and partial models identifying a direction and the force of impact of elements of the structure of employment on the productivity of work make it possible to prepare a model of pro-productive structure of employment. By way of economic analysis, the following elements of the pro-productive structure of employment have been determined according to: the type of activities; seniority; age; education; professions; the forms of work. It is important, both cognitively, and for practice, to learn factors of the structure of employment related to the productivity of work, the result of which in practice will be improvement in planning of the work resources, and also increase in the work productivity in companies. Significance of well conducted analysis and assessment of the productivity of work and preparation of a model structure of employment is to provide in the future an appropriate level of employment in accordance with actual needs and professional staffing of positions, and also an optimal organisational as well as a qualification and professional structure, and also complete and productive use of the working time in accordance with the needs of the company and aspirations of the employees.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References10
Tokarski T., Produktywność pracy w Polsce i w krajach Unii Europejskiej. Trajektorie rozwojowe w latach 1990-2004 oraz przewidywania na przyszłość, [in:] Krajewska A. (red.), Koszty i produktywność pracy w Polsce w kontekście integracji z Unią Europejską, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, 2007, pp 161-178.
Imai M., Kaizen. Klucz do konkurencyjnego systemu Japonii, MT Biznes, Warszawa, 2007, pp 34-45.
Lareau W., Filozofia Kaizen w biurze, Helion, Gliwice, 2009, pp 15-28.
Hammer M. & Champy J., Reengineering w przedsiębiorstwie, Neumann Management Institute, Warszawa, 1996, pp 20-26.
Harrington H.J., Business Process Improvement – the Breakthrough Strategy for Total Quality, Productivity and Competitiveness, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1991, pp 22-30.
Kulkarni P.P. & Kshire S.S. & Chandratre K.V., Productivity improvement through lean deployment & work study methods, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2014, Vol. 03, No 02, pp 429-434.
Dincută-Tănasea I. & Bordea C. & Câmpeana E. & Pop D., Productivity of DMUs: A proposed framework, Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014, No 15, pp 943-950.
Kosieradzka A. & Lis S., Produktywność. Metody analizy, oceny i tworzenia programów poprawy, Wyd. Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa, 2000, pp 81-97.
Kosieradzka A., Zarządzanie produktywnością w przedsiębiorstwie, Wyd. C.H. Beck, Warszawa, 2012, pp 19-25.
Piętowska-Laska R., Polska strategia wzrostu produktywności pracy na tle europejskiej polityki gospodarczej, [in:] Laska A. (red.), Polityka polska w Europie. Tradycje, współczesność, wyzwania przyszłości, Wyd. Amelia, Rzeszów, 2013, pp 101-118.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
