SWS Academic Research eLibrarySocial Sciences & Art

Scholarly record

END-OF-LIFE AND DYING OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES – CONCEPTUALIZATION, TOPICS, SPECIFICS

Jan Chrastina

First published: 2018https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018/3.2/S11.016View metrics

Abstract

Accompanying people with disabilities (PwD) throughout the end-of-life and dying is an important topic in many scientific and study fields. On the basis of a literary research it can be stated that this topic is being relatively neglected in published studies covering rather recurrent themes. PwD have specific needs, require specific access and means of communication, etc. The found published studies have focused on the end-of-life period predominantly in people with mental retardation and cognitive disabilities from childhood to old age. End-of-life accompanied by a number of symptoms calls for a specialized approach as well as high-quality care provided by the staff (and caregivers). Therefore, defining adequately the end-of-life specifics of PwD is necessary. The aim of the paper is to describe the end-of-life and dying of PwD, to define the topics in this area and to describe the needs of this highly specific target group of people (clients) living either in a home or an institutional environment. Since qualitative studies provide valuable research findings, a review of already published meta-syntheses of end-of-life in dying PwD will also be a part of the paper. The paper of a review character used an interpretative content analysis method, studying of the scientific knowledge (available in databases) and a comparison process with an emphasis on partial preparation phases of a review study. The paper could be used as the fulfillment the gap in the research area for the above-mentioned topic of research and application activities.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
END-OF-LIFE AND DYING OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES – CONCEPTUALIZATION, TOPICS, SPECIFICS
Authors
Jan Chrastina
Proceedings
5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2018
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2018
Pages
115-120
SWS Citekey
Chrastina201811115120
ISSN
2367-5659
ISBN
978-619-7408-54-6
Language
en
Publication type
Proceedings Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References15
  1. Hinderer K. A., Reactions to patient death: the lived experience of critical care nurses, Dimensions of critical care nursing, vol. 31/issue 4, pp. 252–259, 2012.

  2. Braddock D., Emerson E., Felce D., Stancliffe R. J., Living circumstances of children and adults with mental retardation or developmental disabilities in the United States, Canada, England and Wales and Australia, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, vol. 7/issue 2, pp. 115–121, 2001.

  3. Bekkema N., de Veer A. J., Hertogh C. M., Francke A. L., From activating towards caring: shifts in care approaches at the end of life of people with intellectual disabilities; a qualitative study of the perspectives of relatives, care-staff and physicians, BMC Palliative Care, vol. 14, p. 33, 2015.

  4. Kirkendall A., Linton K., Farris S., Intellectual disabilities and decision making at end of life: a literature review, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, vol. 30/issue 6, pp. 982–994, 2017.

  5. Wagemans A. M. et al., End-of-life decisions for people with intellectual disabilities, an interview study with patient representatives, Palliative medicine, vol. 27/issue 8, pp. 765–771, 2013.

  6. Watson J., Wilson E., Hagiliassis N., Supporting end of life decision making: case studies of relational closeness in supported decision making for people with severe or profound intellectual disability, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, vol. 30/issue 6, pp. 1022–1034, 2017.

  7. McKenzie N., Mirfin-Veitch B., Conder J., Brandford S., “I’m still here”: exploring what matters to people with intellectual disability during advance care planning, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, vol. 30/issue 6, pp. 1089–1098, 2017.

  8. Lindley L. C., Cozad M. J., Comparative effectiveness of usual source of care approaches to improve end-of-life outcomes for children with intellectual disability, Journal of pain and symptom management, vol. 54/issue 3, pp. 298–304, 2017.

  9. McCallion P. et al., Consensus statement of the International Summit on Intellectual Disability and Dementia related to end-of-life care in advanced dementia, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, vol. 30/issue 6, pp. 1160–1164, 2017.

  10. Wark S., Hussain R., Müller A., Ryan P., Parmenter, T., Challenges in providing end-of-life care for people with intellectual disability: Health services access, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, vol. 30/issue 6, pp. 1151–1159, 2017.

  11. Zaal-Schuller I. H., Willems D. L., Ewals F. V. P. M., van Goudoever J. B., de Vos M. A., How parents and physicians experience end-of-life decision-making for children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities, Research in developmental disabilities, vol. 59, pp. 283–293, 2016.

  12. Tuffrey-Wijne I., Rose T., Grant R., Wijne A., Communicating about death and dying: developing training for staff working in services for people with intellectual disabilities, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, vol. 30/issue 6, pp. 1099–1110, 2017.

  13. Jones P. M., Thoughtfulness and Grace: end-of-life decision making for children with severe developmental disabilities, The American journal of bioethics, vol. 16/issue 2, pp. 72–73, 2016.

  14. Bekkema N., de Veer A. J., Wagemans A. M., Hertogh C. M., Franckle A. L., “To move or not to move”: a national survey among professionals on beliefs and considerations about the place of end-of-life care for people with intellectual disabilities, Journal of intellectual disability research, vol. 59/issue 3, pp. 226–237, 2015.

  15. Schreiber R., Crooks D., Stern P. N., Qualitative metaanalysis. In Morse J. M. (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue, California (Thousand Oaks), 1997, 416 pp.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The SSA Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

SWS Social Sciences and Arts conference
SWS Social Sciences & Arts

Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities

The joint SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities, bringing together research in society, culture, education, law, economics, humanities and the arts.

Visit sgemsocial.org
SWS Vienna When Science Meets Art
SWS Vienna - When Science Meets Art

Social Sciences, Science Meets Art

The Vienna platform for Social Sciences, interdisciplinary research and the dialogue between science, art, society and culture.

Visit sgemvienna.org
SWS Italy The Renaissance Reimagined
SWS Italy - The Renaissance Reimagined

Arts and Humanities, Renaissance Studies

The SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Arts and Humanities in Italy, Florence and Bologna, focused on culture, history, heritage, literature, philosophy, art and humanistic research.

Visit sgemitaly.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications