Scholarly record
EMOJIS AS PREDICTORS IN LOVHEIM CUBE BACKED MULTI-CLASS SENTIMENT ANALYSIS: CAN WE REALLY TRUST THEM?
Abstract
When dealing with multiclass classification problem one has to search for reliable and robust predictors to increase the quality of performance that decreases drastically with growth of classes number. In our research, we propose the sentiment analysis method backed by Lovheim Cube Emotional model including 8 emotional classes unlike traditional two (negative/ positive). To increase the accuracy in case of multi-class classification we need to extract more features from the text than it is usually demanded for binary classifier. One of the most promising features is using emojis on par with text as predictors, as they (by definition) express emotions. To prove the hypothesis we ran our classifier using three feature sets transformed to Bag-Of-Words representation: 1) pure emoji BOW where each occurring emoji was represented as a discrete word (Emojis model), 2) normalized words without emojis (Text model), 3) normalized words including emojis, where each occurring emoji was represented as a discrete word (Text + emojis model). In spite of our expectations, the Emojis model has demonstrated the worst results, but the Text model has performed rather well, showing better total benchmarks than the other two models. The analysis of false positives (6,8 % from all sample) those sentiment was predicted triply (by text only, by both the emojis and the text, by trained before classifier) but was still inconsistent with the real sentiment, has revealed 4 types of situations engendering the discrepancy between text sentiment and emojis sentiment. Firstly, due to the sarcastic or ironical tonality texts express sentiment opposite to those of emoji. Secondly, texts express sentiment different (but not obviously opposite) to those of emoji to realize the speakerВ’s face-saving communicative strategy. Then, text has no emotions, but there are one or more emoji used for making the message more attractive for recipients. Finally, text tonality is ambiguous and emojiВ’s emotional value is unequivocal. These results led us to the conclusion that emoji does not serve as complement for the text, but should be considered as text's meta-data which cannot be straightforwardly processed like an ordinary text token.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References12
Bich-CarriГЁre L., Say it with [A Smiling Face with Smiling Eyes]: Judicial Use and Legal Challenges with Emoji Interpretation in Canada, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Netherlands, 2019, pp 1-37.
Darics E., Politeness in Computer-Mediated Discourse of a Virtual team, Journal of Politeness Research, Germany, vol. 6/issue 1, pp 129-150, 2010.
Davidov D., Tsur O., Rappoport A., Enhanced Sentiment Learning Using Twitter Hashtags and Smileys, 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters (COLING 2010), China, pp. 241-249, 2010.
Derks D., Bos A., von Grumbkow J., Emoticons and Social Interaction on the Internet: The Importance of Social Context, Computers in Human Behaviour, UK, vol. 23, pp 842-849, 2004.
Elfajr N.M., Sarno R., Sentiment Analysis Using Weighted Emoticons and SentiWordNet for Indonesian Language, 2018 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: Creative Technology for Human Life (iSemantic), Indonesia, pp 234-238, 2018.
Grieve R., Moffitt L.M., Radgett R., Student Perceptions of Marker Personality and Intelligence: The Effect of Emoticons in Online Assignment Feedback, Learning and Individual Differences, UK, vol. 69, pp 232-238, 2019.
Hogenboom A., Bal D., Frasincar F., Bal M., De Jong F., Kaymak U., Exploiting Emoticons in Sentiment Analysis, 2018 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: Creative Technology for Human Life (iSemantic), Indonesia, pp 234-238, 2018.
Li L., Yang Y., Pragmatic Functions of Emoji in Internet-Based Communication –A Corpus-Based Study, Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, China, pp1-12, 2018.
LГ¶vheim H., A New Three-dimensional Model for Emotions and Monoamine Neurotransmitters, Medical Hypotheses, US, vol. 78, pp 341-348, 2012.
Maiz C., A Pragmatic and Multimodal Analysis of Emoticons and Gender in Social Networks, New Insights into Gendered Discursive Practices: Language, Gender and Identity Construction, Spain, pp 175-197, 2014.
Velioglu R., Yildiz T., Yildirim S., Sentiment Analysis Using Learning Approaches over Emojis for Turkish Tweets, 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), Bosnia and Herzegovina, pp 303-307, 2018.
Yang G., He H., Chen Q., Emotion-semantic-enhanced neural network, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, US, vol. 27/issue 3, pp 531-543, 2019.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

